The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a cost-cutting initiative spearheaded by Elon Musk during President Trump’s second term, has been dissolved with its functions absorbed by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), according to OPM Director Scott Kupor. Musk’s departure and the subsequent exodus of staff were expected following the expiration of his contract. Despite DOGE’s claims of substantial savings, reports suggest inflated or overstated figures, and many former staffers have moved on to new roles within the government. Initiatives like the hiring freeze, implemented by DOGE, have also been discontinued.
Read the original article here
DOGE Disbanded: Elon Musk’s Cost-Cutting Project Quietly Ended
The news that “DOGE,” the controversial cost-cutting project spearheaded by Elon Musk, has been disbanded, is something to digest. However, the true picture, according to those close to the situation, paints a far more complex and troubling scene than a simple streamlining of government operations. The project, purportedly aimed at rooting out fraud and waste, appears to have left a trail of financial wreckage, data breaches, and human suffering in its wake.
Rather than achieving its stated goals, DOGE seems to have become synonymous with a massive data grab and an increase in the national debt. Critics point out the staggering costs associated with the project, suggesting that any supposed savings were dwarfed by the damage inflicted. The claims are serious: the project facilitated the theft of sensitive data, created backdoors into critical government systems, and potentially cost the US billions of dollars.
Furthermore, there is a deep sense of betrayal among those who believe DOGE was designed to benefit a select few at the expense of ordinary citizens. The project is accused of stripping away vital programs, endangering taxpayer information, and causing real-world harm. Some of the most damning accusations revolve around the alleged dismantling of crucial initiatives like USAID, leading to the loss of lives. This is not just about financial mismanagement; it’s about the alleged prioritization of data collection and political agendas over human welfare.
The ultimate impact is a nation grappling with a shattered sense of security and trust. The very fabric of public service and the integrity of government institutions may have been compromised. The project didn’t bring the savings it was supposed to bring, instead increasing the deficit to its highest levels. Now, the project’s systems are absorbed into existing federal structures, primarily the OPM-Office of Personnel Management.
The legacy of DOGE goes far beyond mere financial losses. The true scope of the damage extends to millions of Americans whose data was stolen and potentially misused, for decades to come, including the massive cut to science and medicine. What was designed as a cost-cutting measure may be one of the most expensive projects in history.
And it’s clear that something more than a simple cost-cutting initiative has been undertaken. Many are angry and want accountability for those involved, with accusations of data theft, backdoor installations, and personal enrichment. The fact that the project was allowed to proceed in the first place raises questions about the oversight and checks and balances within the government.
