By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The article details the dismantling of the Department of Justice by the president, as reported by The New York Times, citing accounts from former career DOJ attorneys. The administration’s actions began with pardons for January 6 rioters, leading to resignations and a diminished Public Integrity Section, reducing its capacity to prosecute cases. The fate of the Epstein files now rests with this compromised DOJ, sparking concerns over their handling, particularly from Democratic senators. Despite the bill demanding release, skepticism abounds regarding the DOJ’s commitment to transparency, given the president’s influence and past actions.
Read the original article here
The Justice Department Simply Can’t Be Trusted with the Epstein Files Transparency Act, and it’s a deeply troubling situation. How can we possibly expect justice when the very institution designed to deliver it is perceived as untrustworthy? The reactions to the Epstein files, the claims of new information surfacing the *day after* the congressional resolution was passed, just reinforce the feeling that something isn’t right. It feels like a carefully orchestrated game, and the public is caught in the middle. The immediate reaction of some high-profile individuals to seemingly brush the whole thing under the rug only amplifies these concerns.
It’s almost comical in its audacity. Months of alleged reviews concluding nothing new, followed by a sudden revelation and renewed investigation. It’s as though there are invisible hands at work, trying to control the narrative and shield certain individuals from scrutiny. Are we supposed to believe this is a genuine turn of events, or is it a calculated maneuver to maintain control and obscure the truth? The timing is incredibly suspicious, making it hard not to suspect a coordinated effort.
The possibility of the files being scrubbed of damaging information, especially information that might implicate certain people, is a legitimate concern. If there are copies out there, hidden from the public eye, that contain the complete, unedited truth, that’s a different ballgame. The question becomes, who possesses them, and when will they be revealed? The public deserves to know the full extent of this situation, and anything less is an injustice to the survivors and victims.
This isn’t just about the Epstein files themselves; it’s about the erosion of trust in our institutions. When the Justice Department seems to be operating under the influence of political agendas, it undermines the very foundation of our justice system. The Comey case, often brought up in these conversations, demonstrates that these institutions are not immune to making questionable decisions. This lack of integrity in the Justice Department erodes faith in their ability to serve justice fairly.
The sentiment that the Justice Department is “fully controlled by the Executive branch and fully weaponized against its opponents” is a stark accusation, but it’s one that many people share. If this is the case, then any act of transparency, especially one involving politically sensitive information, is in danger. The public has to keep the pressure on. We shouldn’t expect to receive the complete truth immediately, and it’s essential that these files are not just scrutinized but also compared to other sources of information, such as the estate’s files or documents held by other countries.
The calls for anonymous hacking and the release of unredacted files highlight the desperation many people feel. If the official channels are blocked, and if the Justice Department can’t be trusted, then alternative methods may seem necessary to expose the truth. The very nature of the case is so politically charged. The act of simply passing a bill isn’t enough. True transparency requires constant vigilance and unwavering public pressure.
The exceptions and carveouts in any bill are also worrisome. Why are there exceptions that allow information to be withheld? Is this a genuine attempt at transparency or a calculated attempt to limit the damage? It’s hard to shake the feeling that the fix is in, and that the ultimate goal is not to reveal the truth but to control the narrative. The fact that the release of the files has already been delayed is not a good sign. The current state of affairs raises questions about the integrity of the judicial system and the possibility of equal justice under the law.