By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Justice Department revealed Wednesday that the grand jury indicting former FBI Director James Comey was never shown the final charges, a lapse admitted during court proceedings. Comey’s attorneys argue this omission warrants dismissal, citing the statute of limitations. Concerns about the prosecution’s integrity were already present, stemming from potential government misconduct and the lead prosecutor’s lack of prior experience. Judge Michael Nachmanoff has yet to rule, acknowledging the complexity of the issues, as the Justice Department addresses the grand jury revelation.
Read the original article here
Trump’s DOJ admits Comey grand jury never saw final indictment. This is a real head-scratcher, isn’t it? The core of the issue here is that the Department of Justice, under the Trump administration, has admitted the grand jury that indicted James Comey never actually got to see the final, finalized version of the charges against him. That’s a huge problem.
Now, imagine the grand jury’s role: they are the ones supposed to be reviewing the evidence and deciding if there’s enough to warrant an indictment. They’re meant to be the safeguard against politically motivated prosecutions, a critical check on government power. The fact that they didn’t see the *final* version of the charges – the one that was actually filed in court – undermines the entire process. It’s like building a house without showing the blueprints to the contractors. How can they be expected to make an informed decision?
The immediate reaction to this admission is one of disbelief and shock. It raises serious questions about the integrity of the process and the motives behind the prosecution. We’re talking about a former FBI Director here. The stakes are high. Any hint of political interference or a compromised process is a major breach of public trust.
Now, let’s consider the implications. Comey’s lawyers are arguing that this omission warrants dismissing the indictment. And they have a strong case. If the grand jury never approved the specific charges filed, then the entire indictment could be seen as invalid. The judge, in this situation, is facing a major decision, as the DOJ’s actions cast a long shadow on the case.
Think about the potential consequences. If the indictment is thrown out, it would be a huge victory for Comey, and a significant embarrassment for the DOJ. More broadly, it could damage the reputation of the Justice Department, raising questions about whether other cases were handled similarly. It would be a major blow to the perception of fairness and impartiality.
This situation really stinks of incompetence and possible political maneuvering. It’s not just about one mistake. It’s about a pattern of actions that raises questions about the overall handling of the case.
The very fact that the DOJ is admitting this lapse is telling. It’s hard to imagine they would do so if they didn’t think there was a high likelihood it would be uncovered. The fact the grand jury was never shown the complete set of charges means the prosecutors may have known there was a problem. It implies some kind of cover-up, or at least, a deliberate effort to skirt the proper legal procedures.
The individuals involved could face serious consequences. At minimum, it’s likely that those who made these decisions will face scrutiny, and potential sanctions. Disbarment, as some have suggested, is a real possibility, given the seriousness of the breach. This is not just a clerical error. It touches on fundamental principles of justice and due process.
The defense attorney involved is in an especially vulnerable spot. If they knowingly withheld information from the grand jury, or misrepresented the charges, they could be accused of fraud or other serious ethics violations.
This case is a stark reminder of the importance of checks and balances in our legal system. It highlights how easily things can go wrong when those checks are weakened or ignored. The grand jury system exists to protect us from overzealous prosecutors and politically motivated prosecutions, so when it fails, it undermines the very foundation of our legal system.
The reactions we’re seeing, the gasps of surprise, the calls for investigations, and the concern about the integrity of the legal system, all underscore the significance of this development. It’s a mess, and it’s a mess that deserves to be investigated thoroughly.
The entire situation is unsettling, and it’s likely to have ripple effects far beyond the Comey case. It highlights a climate of potentially unethical conduct within the DOJ during the Trump administration. The fallout from this admission will undoubtedly be significant, and it’s a stark reminder of the importance of transparency and accountability in the pursuit of justice.