By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Goli Kouhkan, a 25-year-old child bride, faces execution in Iran for the killing of her abusive husband. She was convicted of participating in the killing of her husband, which occurred after years of suffering physical and emotional abuse. Under Iranian law, Kouhkan can be spared if she pays 10 billion tomans (approximately £80,000) to the victim’s family, a sum she is unlikely to obtain, and is representative of the discriminatory treatment of women and minorities in Iran. Human rights groups condemn the case, citing the rising number of executions, particularly of women, and the lack of legal protections against domestic violence and forced marriage within the country. Kouhkan is Baluch, a marginalized ethnic minority, and was married at 12, a situation reflective of the poverty and lack of rights faced by women in Iran.
Read the original article here
Child bride faces execution in Iran unless she pays £80,000 in ‘blood money’ – that’s the horrific reality we’re dealing with here, and it’s a story that unfolds with a sickening lack of surprise, yet still manages to shock. A young woman, forced into marriage at the tender age of twelve, endured the trauma of early motherhood before the unthinkable happened – her husband was killed. Now, she faces the ultimate punishment for a crime she may not even have committed, and the price of her life is a sum that seems utterly impossible to obtain.
The narrative reveals a system built on oppression and injustice. This young woman, Kouhkan, was a child when she was married, thrust into a life she didn’t choose. Her existence became a cycle of abuse and subjugation. When she was just thirteen, she bore a child. Her husband, tragically, was later killed in a fight. In the chaos and fear of interrogation, she signed a confession, even though she couldn’t even read or write. It’s a chilling reminder of the power imbalance and the vulnerability of those caught in the web of an oppressive regime.
The idea that she tried to flee to her parents, only to be met with the heartless declaration that she could only return “wrapped in a shroud,” is heartbreaking. It paints a picture of a society where a woman’s worth is measured by her obedience, and where escape is not an option. It’s easy to see why someone would describe this as a “dystopian” reality. And the fact that she is unlikely to have any contact with her son, now being raised by his paternal grandparents, adds another layer of profound sadness to an already tragic situation.
The responses to this news are varied, and understandably, largely filled with anger and disgust. Many of the comments echo the sentiment that this is “classic Islamic Republic behavior” and express frustration that religious extremism continues to allow and even encourage the mistreatment of women. There is a sense of despair at the cruelty and the seemingly endless capacity for the regime to inflict pain. Many also acknowledge the double standard, lamenting that if the perpetrators were not Muslim, the situation might garner the outrage and protests it deserved. The lack of condemnation and action is just another source of outrage for some.
The mention of “blood money” highlights the perversion of justice at play here. It’s a transaction, a price tag on a human life, dictated by a barbaric system that prioritizes tradition and religious dogma above basic human rights. The fact that the amount is set at a staggering £80,000 adds to the absurdity of the situation. How could a woman in her circumstances possibly amass such a sum? The only hope is that the international community, or humanitarian organizations, can intervene, but the time is quickly running out.
Many commenters point to the apparent inequalities and the importance of recognizing that all cultures are not equal. Some point out that “all religions allow for the subjugation of women.” The tragic situation is a stark reminder of the challenges women face in many parts of the world, often compounded by religious fundamentalism and cultural traditions. It is not about dismissing the complexities of different cultures, it is about condemning the oppression.
Some voices also highlight the hypocrisy of Western societies, pointing out that child marriage is legal in some parts of the world, including the United States. This is a crucial point, as it serves to underline the universal nature of the problem, and the need for global condemnation and action. Though the situation in Iran is extreme, the article encourages us to acknowledge that the problems of the world aren’t limited to a single country or religion. This is a call to action.
The need for justice is a constant theme throughout the comments. The call for the international community to take action and support Kouhkan in her time of need is an important one. It’s a reminder that we have a collective responsibility to speak out against injustice and to offer support to those who are suffering. It is about demanding justice, equality, and compassion for all, regardless of their background or religious belief.