By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Canadian travel to the US has been declining for ten consecutive months, with air and car travel significantly dropping compared to last year. This trend reflects a broader response to US policies and trade actions, particularly tariffs imposed by the Trump administration. The US Travel Association notes a 3.2% decrease in international spending, largely due to fewer Canadian visitors who previously represented a significant portion of international tourism. Despite some efforts by US destinations to attract Canadians, the relationship remains strained, and the boycott appears to be continuing.
Read the original article here
Canadian boycott of US travel shows no sign of slowing, and it’s clear this isn’t just a blip on the radar. It’s more like a seismic shift in how Canadians view and interact with their southern neighbor. It’s not just about economics or convenience anymore; it’s become a matter of principle, safety, and a fundamental disagreement with the direction the US has taken.
The sentiments are strong and consistent. The prevailing attitude is not that of a temporary pause, but a complete divorce. Many Canadians are actively choosing to explore their own country, with places like Montreal seeing a surge in Canadian tourists. Others are looking beyond North America altogether, with Europe and Mexico becoming increasingly popular destinations. The initial trigger for many was a perceived threat, a situation where a close ally was openly targeted. The idea of potential annexation, voiced by the former US administration, struck a deep chord.
This sentiment has hardened into a collective resolve. The notion of supporting an economy and a political climate that many Canadians find deeply objectionable is something they simply won’t do. The boycott has become a habit, ingrained in everyday choices. Decisions are being made at every level, from vacation planning to choosing where to buy everyday products. Even those who once regularly traveled to the US for work are now minimizing their spending there, seeking alternatives wherever possible. It’s a fundamental shift in behavior that speaks volumes.
The driving forces behind this boycott are varied, but several key factors repeatedly emerge. A primary concern is the US political landscape. The former administration’s policies and rhetoric have been a major source of contention, with the threat of annexation being a particularly egregious offense. This isn’t just about policy disagreements; it’s a deep-seated unease about the direction the US is heading. Concerns about personal safety also play a significant role. The potential for arbitrary detention and the actions of agencies like ICE, are raising serious red flags for Canadian travelers. Many are unwilling to risk being caught up in what they perceive as an increasingly authoritarian environment.
The economic aspect is also significant. The feeling is that every dollar spent in the US is, in a way, funding a system that many Canadians oppose. This goes beyond the usual economic considerations; it’s a moral stance. The exchange rate, while a factor, isn’t the primary driver of this trend. Even when financially feasible, many Canadians are choosing to forgo travel to the US. This points towards the depth of the boycott, and the fact that it is not dependent on purely economic factors.
The impact of this shift is visible, and it’s being felt by the US tourism industry. Reports from border states indicate a decline in Canadian visitors, and businesses are struggling to adapt. The responses from the American side are varied, with many businesses expressing a desire for the return of Canadian tourists.
The boycott extends beyond leisure travel. Even those who used to frequent the US for work are changing their habits. The overall trend isn’t just about a change in vacation destinations. Many Canadians are also consciously choosing to purchase Canadian-made or internationally-made products over US-made ones. This is a far-reaching consequence that showcases the boycott’s depth.
The long-term implications of this sustained boycott are significant. It underscores a fundamental re-evaluation of the relationship between Canada and the United States. It’s a reminder of the power of consumer choice and the potential for a collective response to political and social concerns. The desire for a changed US leadership may have been the spark, but the reasons for the continued boycott have become far more complex. The relationship needs to heal, and while many Canadians would be open to a renewed relationship at some point, there is still much that needs to change before that can happen.
It’s clear that this is more than just a passing phase. It’s a fundamental shift in attitudes and behaviors.