By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The following is a summary of the Shopping Trends team’s work, which is independent of CTV News journalists. The team focuses on providing information about shopping trends and may earn commissions when links are used for purchases. This commission structure allows the team to maintain its operations and independence. Readers should be aware that the recommendations provided are potentially influenced by these financial incentives. Further information on the team’s practices can be found in the “About Us” section.
Read the original article here
The crux of the matter revolves around the proposition that Saab can offer Canada a deal on par with, or even more advantageous than, the existing agreement for the U.S. F-35 fighter jets. It’s a tempting idea, and one that taps into a complex web of strategic considerations, economic realities, and a healthy dose of skepticism towards our American allies.
This isn’t just about comparing the technical specs of the F-35 and the Saab Gripen, although that plays a role. It’s about a complete package that includes in-country industrial development, something that’s always hugely important in Canadian defense procurement. With Bombardier’s decline, there’s a real opportunity to bolster the Canadian aerospace industry, and Saab could be the key to turning that around. We are also talking about a good option for a hybrid fighter force to mix F-35s and Gripens. This approach considers that the F-35 would be for overseas combat and the other for homeland defense.
One of the biggest driving factors here is the underlying unease about relying solely on the United States. Let’s be honest, America’s actions haven’t exactly instilled unwavering trust lately. There’s a nagging worry that the U.S. might use its control over the F-35 for political leverage, and the whole concept of a “kill switch” controlled by another nation isn’t exactly comforting. So, the idea of turning to a more reliable, albeit potentially less technologically advanced, partner like Sweden starts to look a whole lot more appealing.
Now, let’s address the elephant in the room: the military’s preference for a single platform, the F-35. They see the Gripen as inferior, and they’re likely concerned about the logistical headaches and resource demands of operating two different fighter fleets. But it’s also worth recognizing that Canada’s air force, while capable, isn’t exactly the biggest in the world. We’re primarily focused on defending our airspace and occasionally participating in multinational operations. Maybe the cutting-edge features of the F-35 are overkill for our primary needs.
The economic implications are also huge. A deal with Saab could bring thousands of manufacturing jobs to Canada. It’s about building our own capabilities and fostering a sense of national sovereignty. We could still get some F-35s but also get a lot of Gripens.
Of course, there are downsides. The Gripen might not be as technologically advanced as the F-35. The cost of integrating a new platform, including new refueling and training aircraft, could be substantial. And then there’s the political pressure. The Americans, with their lobbying efforts, won’t make this easy.
However, consider the benefits: a reliable partner, a boost to our domestic aerospace industry, and the ability to dictate our own terms. Sweden is a neutral and stable country, unlikely to interfere with our defense.
This isn’t about picking the “best” fighter jet, in a vacuum. It’s about the best *overall* deal for Canada. The F-35 is great, but is it the best option for us right now, given the current geopolitical climate and economic conditions? Maybe not. A mix of F-35s and Gripens is a reasonable compromise. And, let’s be honest, the idea of potentially sticking it to certain folks in Washington while boosting our own economy is undeniably attractive. The fact that the Gripen is an economical option per flight hour makes it even better.
Plus, we have to recognize that the Gripen is perfectly adequate for the job.
So, while the F-35 might be the shiny new toy, the Gripen offers a compelling alternative. It’s a fighter jet, but more than that. It’s a statement of independence, a commitment to our own economic future, and a strategic move that could pay off handsomely in the long run. The government would be foolish not to carefully consider this offer.