By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In a recent speech, former President Joe Biden sharply criticized his successor, alleging that President Trump has damaged democracy. Biden claimed Trump acted as though he was taking a “wrecking ball” to the country, mocking Trump’s claims of a “golden age” during his second term in office. Biden also addressed the importance of healthcare, connecting his experience with prostate cancer to the ongoing political debates surrounding healthcare funding. Finally, the former president emphasized the importance of defending democracy, urging supporters to work towards electing leaders who will uphold democratic principles and values.
Read the original article here
Biden says Trump has ‘taken a wrecking ball’ to democracy in sharp criticism, and frankly, it’s a statement that’s sparking some serious debate. The air is thick with a mixture of agreement and frustration, and it’s easy to see why. The core of the issue boils down to this: many feel that while Biden is correct in his assessment of Trump’s actions, his own actions – or rather, inactions – during his presidency have contributed to the current situation.
The sentiment is clear: people are expressing deep dissatisfaction, claiming that Biden had a clear opportunity to hold Trump accountable, to prevent what many see as the erosion of democratic principles. The most common criticism revolves around the perceived failure to aggressively pursue legal action against Trump and his associates for their actions. This point is a source of intense resentment, with people expressing feelings of betrayal and disappointment.
The criticisms often involve the argument that Biden and his administration were too cautious. The accusation is that the administration prioritized a return to “normalcy” over a vigorous pursuit of justice. This is described by some as a failure, a moment of weakness, and the equivalent of “playing by the rules” in a situation where the other side was playing a different, much more aggressive game. The sentiment is that this approach has allowed the situation to deteriorate, ultimately contributing to the current challenges.
One of the more powerful observations is that Biden, with his history in politics, saw the danger of Trump’s actions. The comment here is that Biden had the opportunity, and was in a powerful position, to stop Trump, but chose a different path. The point being made is that Biden’s legacy will be negatively impacted, because he didn’t prevent Trump from returning to power, given the chance and means to do so.
The frustration is also directed towards the Democratic Party in general. The argument is that it’s not just about one person (Trump) but the entire Republican apparatus and their plans to dismantle the government, law and order, and the future.
The criticism also touches on a perceived lack of foresight. Many feel that Biden should have recognized the seriousness of the situation, especially the damage that was inflicted on democracy. This goes hand-in-hand with accusations of not taking the necessary steps to prevent it from happening, even when he had an opportunity to do so. The common expression is: “You had four years to do something about it. And you didn’t.”
Some people go as far as to express a desire for Biden to simply “shut up,” that his words ring hollow considering the circumstances. Many feel that Biden’s actions, or lack thereof, have made him a part of the problem. This sentiment is amplified by the perceived irony of Biden criticizing Trump for something that many believe Biden himself enabled or could have prevented.
At the heart of it, the criticism is a clash between what was hoped for and what was actually done. In many ways, Biden’s presidency is now being viewed as a missed opportunity, a time when crucial steps could have been taken to protect democracy and hold those who undermined it accountable. The call for action, a sentiment that many would likely share, has not been heard, with the expression, “And you welcomed him in with a smile and a handshake.”
The overall impression is one of intense anger and disappointment, a reflection of the challenges facing the United States and the future. While Biden is right to warn of the dangers, the criticism is that he is also complicit, a charge that will likely follow him and define much of his legacy.