By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Belgian army has been authorized to shoot down unidentified drones over military bases following several nights of suspicious activity, according to Chief of Defense Frederik Vansina. Defense Minister Theo Francken suggested these incidents might be part of an espionage operation, potentially linked to recent incursions in European airspace. Belgium’s capacity to counter drones is currently limited, mirroring concerns across Europe where similar incidents have prompted calls for enhanced anti-drone capabilities. While the EU’s “drone wall” initiative faces setbacks, NATO’s Eastern Sentry project aims to fortify defenses along the eastern frontier.
Read the original article here
Belgian military orders to shoot down unknown drones over bases – finally, some action! It’s striking, isn’t it, that this move is only happening now. You have to wonder why it wasn’t standard procedure to protect military installations by controlling the airspace above them all along. It seems logical, almost like a basic security measure. The fact that these drones have been popping up over various countries, including the USA, UK, Germany, and others, without immediate countermeasures is, frankly, surprising.
The scope of these drone incursions in Belgium appears to be broader than initially reported, with reports suggesting multiple military sites affected. Beyond just Liege and Brussels, places like Schaffen, Leopoldsburg, Florennes, and Kleine Brogel are allegedly involved. It’s a significant scale, and it naturally raises questions. Considering the timing, it’s hard not to connect this with the ongoing discussions around decisions regarding Russian assets. The timing of everything does make you think about underlying factors at play.
Intelligence reports suggesting Russian involvement are, of course, cause for concern. If true, it raises the stakes considerably. The question of when NATO will acknowledge, or formally declare a state of, war with Russia, is an important one. It prompts you to consider, what are we actually dealing with here?
It’s been a long time coming. The details of the situation are slowly unfolding, but the core issue remains – there are unidentified drones operating in Belgian airspace, and the military is now authorized to take them down. There’s a certain irony in all this, considering previous accounts of slow decision-making, it does feel like the wheels of bureaucracy turn slowly. The reports of a meeting this Thursday to “decide” what to do are telling of the bureaucratic process.
There’s a lot of debate about the nature of these drones, and there’s speculation about UAPs and UFOs. But, if you consider the number of countries between Russia and Belgium, you wonder if this issue is being addressed at all? The economic consideration does arise, particularly about using expensive weaponry. The cost-effectiveness of downing a relatively inexpensive commercial drone with a million-dollar missile is questionable. Moreover, shooting down anything over civilian areas presents a clear risk. The potential for collateral damage must be paramount.
Reports that the drones causing the most commotion have turned out to be ordinary commercial drones used by tourists is a sobering reminder that mass hysteria can be a powerful force. This is not to diminish the potential threat, but the impact of misinformation or misidentification is clear. The same logic is true for the news media.
Kleine Brogel is an interesting detail. Belgium’s small size makes it easy to move around within its borders. The focus on anti-drone measures could potentially divert resources from other important areas.
The potential for laser technology is another option to take into account. It is definitely a viable option.
It seems remarkable, how long this issue has persisted without decisive action. The news reports are finally coming out.
One clear take away is to rely on reliable sources, particularly government news outlets. There’s also the notion of a shadow fleet. If the enemy is coming in, it is not a surprise. These things are happening, and there are many opportunities to combat it.
There are many solutions to consider, including using anti-drone weapons, jammers, and potentially even repurposing existing equipment like the Gepard, or even shotguns. But as you know, war is a difficult, messy thing.
The Belgian military’s lack of missile systems creates a situation where the tactics deployed are limited to those available. There are many limits on what can be done. However, there are many options.
The focus must be on safety and avoiding unnecessary escalation.
It appears the military has confirmed these aren’t just consumer-grade drones, and the apparent intent of the operators is a concerning development. The approaches for doing so vary.
The importance of using appropriate ammunition and technology is also critical. These are considerations that come into play.
Ultimately, the focus must be on protecting military assets and minimizing risks to civilians. It is time to act.