By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The House of Representatives is poised to vote on the release of previously unreleased Department of Justice files related to Jeffrey Epstein. Congresswoman-elect Adelita Grijalva, a Democrat, is expected to sign the petition, bringing the total number of signatures to the required 218 to force a floor vote. While Speaker Mike Johnson denies any intentional delay, some speculate that Grijalva’s delayed swearing-in was strategic to prevent the vote. If the petition passes the House, it would then require Senate approval to be enacted.
Read the original article here
Decisive Dem on Epstein Files Petition Will Finally Be Sworn In | Adelita Grijalva, of Arizona, has had her swearing-in delayed for seven weeks, and it’s a situation that’s stirring up a lot of speculation and frustration, which is understandable. The seven-week delay in swearing in Adelita Grijalva is concerning, especially when coupled with the push for the release of the Epstein files. Some believe the delay is a deliberate tactic to obstruct the release of information. It creates the impression that someone is trying to control the situation and prevent transparency.
It appears the delay could potentially be used to protect specific individuals. The question of who might block the release of the files is a hot topic, with some pointing fingers at certain Republicans. There’s a general sense that the full, unedited version of these files might never see the light of day. A feeling exists that they’ll find a way to redact or otherwise hinder the release of truly revealing information. This lack of faith stems from the belief that powerful figures are being protected, possibly through behind-the-scenes dealings and influence. The potential for a “Snowdenesque” leak is seen as the only realistic hope for complete transparency.
The mechanics of this situation also seem insane. Questions are being raised about the rules surrounding swearing-in dates, with suggestions that there should be a maximum waiting period. Giving the Speaker of the House such power to delay seems wrong to many. There are questions about the integrity of the files themselves, particularly if they’ve been subject to tampering or redaction. Concerns are raised about whether the released files will be a true reflection of the original.
There’s a prevailing distrust of the Department of Justice’s involvement. Some see the DOJ as an entity unlikely to deliver the files without significant alterations. There is the belief that the files will be tailored to expose certain people and shield others, which undermines the entire process. The possibility of the process being stalled and delayed further is a real concern.
Many are losing faith in the ability to hold those involved accountable. There’s a sentiment that the whole situation is a manipulative game. The fact that the votes are not anonymous, creates opportunities for influence and deal-making, which further erodes trust.