By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The article discusses a scenario where an individual obstinately claims Texas A&M is the top-ranked team, despite contrary evidence. This individual effectively halts productive discussion by dismissing factual rankings, effectively “winning” the argument by shutting down debate and becoming the focus. The person achieves this despite being factually incorrect, causing the others to expend mental energy addressing a false premise. If this person and their views are widely respected, and they’ve cultivated a loyal following, the resulting controversy can consume a larger group, creating a pointless debate based on falsehoods.
Read the original article here
America Is Finally Starting to See Trump for the Bullsh*t Artist He Is
It seems a common sentiment is finally starting to bubble to the surface: many in America are beginning to see Donald Trump for what he truly is. This realization, however, isn’t a new revelation for everyone. For a significant portion of the population, the “bullsh*t artist” persona was glaringly obvious from the start, a sentiment echoed across various perspectives.
The narrative often starts with the idea that Trump’s appeal was strategically crafted. The notion of offering belonging, of fostering a sense of community to those willing to surrender critical thinking, is a frequently mentioned element. This strategy, the argument goes, successfully built the MAGA movement, providing a solid base of support.
Fast forward to the present, and the cracks in the facade are beginning to show. The promises of prosperity haven’t materialized. Economic hardship, rising costs, and the concentration of wealth in the hands of the few are realities that starkly contradict the initial promises. The red hat, once a symbol of belonging, is now, for some, a mark of being easily misled.
The comments express a deep-seated frustration. The sheer audacity of the con, the lack of decency and empathy, the ruthless pursuit of self-interest, all painted a grim picture. The tax cuts for the wealthy, the apparent disregard for ethical standards – these are the key elements that many see as evidence of a calculated grift.
The question then becomes: who is finally waking up? The consensus seems to be that a significant portion of the population has always recognized the truth. The claim is that Trump’s true nature has been visible for decades, particularly for those familiar with his business practices and public persona.
The core of the issue extends beyond mere deception. The comments point out the fundamental flaws within Trump’s character: the lack of empathy, the absence of genuine concern for others, and a deep-seated narcissism. They argue that this isn’t just a con man but a person completely out of touch with any ethical standards.
The critique continues with a scathing assessment of Trump’s supporters. Some observers express the belief that a core base will remain steadfast in their support, regardless of the evidence. However, there is a glimmer of hope that the current economic strain may be the catalyst for some to reconsider their allegiance.
There is a sense that the press and media have failed in their duty to accurately portray Trump. The argument is made that the media has not always provided the necessary context or exposed his actions for what they are. This media failure, some believe, has helped perpetuate the illusion.
In the end, the core takeaway is a complex one. While some are waking up to the truth now, many have known it for a long time. The solution is not in the hands of the American voters. The responsibility lies with the Republican party, who have the power to stop him.