By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Volodymyr Zelensky warned that a new Russian mobilization could ignite a world war, fueled by Vladimir Putin’s need to demonstrate success after setbacks in Ukraine. This warning is issued amidst increased Russian provocations against NATO countries, including drone incursions into European airspace. The Ukrainian president believes a new mobilization would be a challenge to Europe, potentially leading to a major conflict, despite the unpopularity and societal disruptions caused by the 2022 mobilization. Zelensky and other European leaders continue to express concerns about unchecked Russian aggression extending beyond Ukraine’s borders, escalating tensions between Russia and NATO.
Read the original article here
Europe faces a “significant risk” of major war if Russia starts mobilization, as the situation is currently understood. The core of this assessment revolves around the understanding that a substantial mobilization by Russia would signal an escalation of conflict, potentially beyond the current borders of Ukraine. This leads to the possibility of widespread conflict, with potentially devastating consequences for the entire continent.
The logic, as it appears to be perceived, is that if Russia significantly increases its military capacity and begins preparing for a wider war, the likelihood of that war actually happening dramatically increases. This is not simply a matter of speculation, but a strategic assessment: escalating mobilization equals an increased chance of wider war.
This perspective suggests a degree of skepticism regarding Russia’s capabilities. It’s pointed out that Russia has struggled to achieve its goals in Ukraine. The fact that the Russian military has not conquered even a portion of Ukraine, after over two years of active combat, fuels the questions surrounding their capacity to launch a larger scale invasion across Europe. There’s also the economic factor, with some suggesting that Russia is facing economic collapse, making a major European conflict less probable due to the resources needed.
The potential for a wider conflict is also weighed against the understanding of mutual assured destruction. The idea of a nuclear-armed adversary forces a consideration of the likely consequences of any significant escalation. There is a shared understanding of the risks involved in conflict between nuclear powers, with the underlying assumption being that the use of nuclear weapons would trigger a catastrophic response, rendering the aggressor’s actions ultimately futile.
The possibility of hybrid warfare, involving disinformation and influence operations, is also acknowledged. The implication is that Russia could employ a range of tactics, including undermining European unity and weakening defense capabilities, to pave the way for military action. This kind of threat suggests the need for vigilance and unity among European nations to withstand such pressures.
In this view, Russia may have a clear understanding of their position. A move to mobilize might then be a last resort measure, aiming to buy time and resources, knowing that the conflict would involve immense losses. The use of nuclear weapons is seen as a dangerous gamble. Given the risk of retaliation, the chance of total destruction outweighs any potential military benefit.
Furthermore, it’s pointed out that Russia is not a monolithic entity. China’s influence might play a key role in restraining Russia. China may not allow the use of nuclear weapons, understanding the devastating repercussions and the impact it would have on China’s standing.
Ultimately, the analysis presents a complex picture. The risk of a major war in Europe if Russia mobilizes is seen as real, given the circumstances of the ongoing conflict. However, the analysis also recognizes the constraints Russia faces, from military limitations to economic instability and the potential consequences of escalating the conflict to a wider scale. The conclusion seems to be that while the risk is significant, the path to war is not inevitable. This is a critical analysis requiring thoughtful assessment of all the variables and the potential consequences.