By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Venezuelan government has shuttered its embassy in Oslo, according to Norway’s foreign ministry. The ministry did not provide an explanation for the closure. This announcement occurred just days after opposition leader Maria Corina Machado received the Nobel Peace Prize. The news was reported by the Agence France-Presse.
Read the original article here
Venezuela closing its embassy in Norway, as confirmed by the Norwegian Foreign Ministry, is a direct consequence of Maria Corina Machado, a prominent Venezuelan opposition leader, being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. This move, a sudden and seemingly retaliatory measure, sent ripples of surprise through international circles.
The Nobel Peace Prize, of course, is awarded by the Norwegian Nobel Committee, an independent body. While the ceremony takes place in Oslo, and its members are appointed by the Norwegian Parliament, the committee’s decisions are made without direct government influence. This is a crucial distinction that, unfortunately, is often lost on those who disagree with the prize’s recipient.
Reports quickly surfaced about the closure. The Oslo newspaper *VG* noted the embassy’s phone lines went unanswered, followed by their complete disconnection. This prompted the Foreign Ministry’s confirmation, stating that they had “received information from Venezuela’s embassy that they were closing the embassy,” without any explicit explanation. This lack of transparency only fuels speculation.
The Norwegian Foreign Ministry, while acknowledging the closure, emphasized Norway’s desire to maintain dialogue with Venezuela. They indicated their intention to keep communication lines open and work toward it, a diplomatic balancing act in the face of this unexpected move. At the same time, the Ministry spokesperson reasserted that the Nobel Committee operates independently of the Norwegian government, which seems to be the reason that the government has no responsibility.
It’s not hard to see the connection, and why this might have rubbed certain figures in the Venezuelan government the wrong way. Maria Corina Machado, a vocal critic of the current regime, has been awarded this prestigious prize for her efforts to restore democracy and promote free elections in Venezuela. It’s the sort of recognition that highlights the failings of the country’s current leadership.
The whole situation is somewhat reminiscent of the behavior often displayed by authoritarian regimes when faced with international criticism. Instead of addressing the underlying issues, they sometimes resort to displays of defiance. This could be perceived as a way to show strength.
It’s interesting to note the perception that the Nobel Committee, while independent in name, might be perceived as having at least some political leanings because its members are appointed by parliament, who are often retired politicians.
As for the Nobel Foundation, there have been discussions in the past about disentangling itself from the Norwegian Parliament. Alfred Nobel’s will outlined the process for selecting the Peace Prize recipient, however some may argue that it is time for the Foundation to adapt to the changing geopolitical landscape. Ultimately, it’s worth reiterating the core purpose of the Peace Prize, which is to recognize individuals and organizations working towards peace and human rights. The fact that certain governments, like Venezuela’s, react negatively doesn’t diminish the prize’s significance.