By John Q. Hosedrinker 
An “Antifascist Tailgate” event is scheduled to take place at the University of Virginia on Friday evening, where participants plan to burn American flags. Organized by Kirk Wolff on behalf of an unofficial group, the event is a protest against Trump’s recent executive order regarding flag desecration, which Wolff argues is an attempt to undermine democracy. University officials confirmed the group is not officially recognized and no approval was granted for the demonstration, however, expressive activity is permitted as long as it is within university policies and legal regulations. The event is planned in response to Trump’s executive order directing prosecution for those who desecrate the flag.
Read the original article here
University of Virginia students holding “antifascist” flag burning events to protest a Trump order is a clear act of defiance, a statement boldly declaring their opposition to perceived overreach. It’s a powerful symbol, and let’s be clear, it’s a protected form of free speech. Veterans, combat veterans, and even police officers are stepping forward to voice their support, recognizing the fundamental right to protest, even when the method is controversial. The group behind the event, calling themselves “Friends Against Fascism Organization” or FAFO, aren’t just making a political statement; they are making history.
The act itself, burning the flag, is steeped in historical precedent. As one commenter pointed out, it’s often the accepted way to retire an old, worn flag, a practice even the Boy Scouts have observed for decades. The fact that Trump attempted to criminalize this act speaks volumes, especially since the authority to make such laws resides in the Legislative Branch, not the Executive. Regardless of personal feelings toward the flag, the ability to protest and express dissent is a cornerstone of American democracy.
Many people find the act of burning a flag to be personally distasteful. However, they understand that it’s not just about the fabric; it’s about the rights and freedoms that the flag represents, the very rights that allow for such acts of protest. This kind of event can be seen as a challenge, a confrontation of injustice, a way to disrupt the status quo. It is an important part of the right to be unpopular.
The student’s actions, though perhaps not universally popular, are meant to challenge fascism. While some suggest the optics could be improved by burning Nazi flags, the core message remains: the students are using a powerful symbol to voice their disgust and demand change. It’s a time to break the law, to not be lectured about doing it the right way, but instead be active about it.
The use of flag burning as protest is deeply intertwined with the concept of free speech. Trump’s attempt to make it illegal is a direct challenge to the First Amendment. The students are acting according to the precedents of history. The students seem to be aware of what they are doing and are hoping to provoke a response. They are testing the boundaries, pushing back against perceived infringements on their rights, and inspiring others to do the same.
In today’s political climate, such protests are more crucial than ever. In Germany, for example, anti-fascism is a matter of state, a lesson learned from the horrors of the past. Perhaps it is the time for a revolution, to change the one party system. Events like this can be a catalyst for broader movements, encouraging people to legally protest, speak out, and challenge the powers that be.