By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The United States has amassed a significant military presence in the Caribbean, including warships and a nuclear submarine, while also threatening direct military action against Venezuela. This build-up is ostensibly to combat drug trafficking, but evidence suggests the claims against the Venezuelan government are fabricated. Experts assert Venezuela is not a significant player in the drug trade. The primary motivation appears to be regime change, with potential scenarios ranging from continued extrajudicial killings to air strikes or a full-scale military invasion. Such intervention could destabilize the region, worsen the ongoing humanitarian crisis, and ironically, empower drug cartels.
Read the original article here
The US warships off Venezuela aren’t there to fight drugs. This is the simple, undeniable truth at the heart of the matter. The presence of these vessels, particularly in the waters near Venezuela, raises a lot of questions. The official line, the one often repeated by certain figures in the media, is that they’re there to combat drug trafficking. But a closer look, a deeper understanding of the situation, reveals a far more complex, and frankly, more concerning reality.
The historical context is crucial here. The United States has a long history of using various pretexts to justify military intervention in other countries. The “War on Drugs” itself, while presented as a noble cause, has often served as a convenient smokescreen for pursuing other, less transparent objectives. We’ve seen it time and again, from Iraq to Afghanistan, where the initial justifications for war ultimately proved to be misleading, if not outright false. The core narrative is carefully crafted to appeal to the American people, using fear and security as powerful tools to gain support for actions that might not otherwise be palatable.
Now, we’re presented with a similar scenario in Venezuela. The convenient scapegoat in this instance is the alleged drug trade. But the distance between the two nations and the mechanics of drug trafficking don’t really support the claim that this is the primary goal. Drug traffickers aren’t typically using ocean-going vessels to traverse that distance. The geography simply doesn’t add up. And if combating drugs was truly the priority, wouldn’t efforts be focused closer to home? The massive resources being deployed in the Caribbean seem disproportionate to the actual problem.
It’s worth noting that the individuals who often champion these narratives have a vested interest in the outcome. There’s a clear pattern of those in power using this as a tool. A focus on “ocean drugs” feels like a distraction. It’s a way to garner support for a conflict while the real goal is less explicitly stated. When you follow the money, you often find the true motivation.
The underlying issue, and the one that everyone seems to be ignoring, is the oil. Venezuela sits atop vast reserves of oil, making it a strategically valuable asset. It’s no secret that the United States has an interest in accessing these resources. And if a regime change is a desirable end, it is achieved for a myriad of reasons, not the least of which is to establish a compliant government that can facilitate the acquisition of those resources. This plays into the political interests of those involved, including the potential for personal gain.
The idea of regime change is not new. The history books are full of examples. Unfortunately, in most cases, these endeavors have not been successful, with very little long-term positive change and more often resulting in instability, conflict, and humanitarian crises.
Furthermore, it’s pretty clear that certain figures are pushing for action on Venezuela. This is all about gaining access to Venezuelan oil, and a government controlled by them can make this dream a reality. The situation is not about democracy, or human rights, or even drugs. This is about power and resource control.
When you look at the larger picture, it becomes evident that the “War on Drugs” is simply the latest chapter in a long history of U.S. interventionism. The use of this narrative to justify military presence and potentially conflict is a well-worn tactic. The true motivation is almost always about political interests, economic gain, and the pursuit of strategic advantage.
The notion that Trump and his allies are concerned about bringing democracy is laughable. Their interest lies in the oil and minerals. If they can get control of those resources, all other considerations fall by the wayside.
In this scenario, where the stated reason for the military presence and the real reason for it are two different things, the potential for manipulation is vast. The risk of escalating conflict, the disregard for international law, and the potential for a humanitarian disaster are all very real.
This isn’t about protecting Americans. It’s not about eradicating drugs. It’s about leveraging political power for economic gain.
This is a dangerous game. It’s a game being played with the lives and security of the people of Venezuela. And it’s a game that could have far-reaching and devastating consequences. Let’s not fall for the narrative. Let’s look beyond the surface. Let’s see the truth for what it is.