By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The elite helicopter unit, the 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment (SOAR), known as the Night Stalkers, has a long history of carrying out dangerous missions, most of which take place under the cover of darkness. Recently, the Night Stalkers have been spotted off the coast of Venezuela, coinciding with increased pressure from the US on President Nicolás Maduro’s government. This military presence, along with other deployments and covert actions, has raised concerns about a potential US intervention in Venezuela, with several possible outcomes being considered. Some believe that the situation could lead to the removal of Maduro, or a deal that would grant the US access to Venezuela’s resources. However, such an operation would not be without risk, as the Venezuelan military and militia fighters could potentially pose a serious threat to the Night Stalkers.
Read the original article here
US ‘Night Stalkers’ seen in Caribbean as fears of regime change rise in Venezuela, and it’s certainly a hot topic, isn’t it? The whispers about the U.S. military’s Special Operations Aviation Regiment – the “Night Stalkers” – being spotted in the Caribbean certainly ratchet up the tension, especially given the ongoing political turmoil in Venezuela. It’s hard to ignore the implications. The mere presence of these highly-trained, elite units, known for their stealth and precision, suggests that the U.S. is seriously considering its options, which for some means a potential intervention.
The idea of regime change in Venezuela sparks a range of reactions. Many people across the political spectrum are critical of Maduro’s government and would welcome his removal. But, let’s be honest, the history of U.S. interventions in Latin America is a complicated one, and it’s riddled with unintended consequences. People are right to remember these instances, because they often led to long-term instability and often, more suffering than before.
In the context of Venezuela, the stakes are incredibly high. The potential for a ground invasion is definitely being speculated. The thinking is that if the “Night Stalkers” are there, other special operation forces (SOF) may be following close behind to do interdiction activities on the ground. The presence of these elite units often precedes larger-scale operations. If a ground invasion were to happen, it is expected that the real war will then begin. Controlling a country like Venezuela is not easy. Bombs and initial military strikes are simple, but what comes after is incredibly difficult.
The underlying motivation often gets reduced to “cheap oil,” and I think that does a huge disservice to the complex factors at play. However, it’s pretty clear that economic interests are a driving factor in all this. The country has significant oil reserves, and that’s not something the U.S. – or other global powers – can easily ignore.
Looking at the current situation, the concern is that such a move would further destabilize the entire region. The refugee crisis, which already presents immense challenges, could explode, putting further pressure on the United States and its neighbors. Of course, any such move would also be seen by some as a naked display of imperialist behavior.
Maduro’s options are limited. Any offensive action against the U.S. would likely trigger a massive and immediate response. One possible move is that Maduro could flee, perhaps to Cuba or China.
Many people would agree that Maduro is a problem, but that doesn’t necessarily mean a U.S. intervention is the right answer. Such interventions are expensive, and often counterproductive. You have to consider the risk of a protracted conflict, with the potential for thousands of lives lost and trillions of dollars wasted.
There’s a lot of debate about whether this is a matter of “fears” or “hopes” of regime change. Many Venezuelans are likely hoping for an end to Maduro’s government, given the country’s economic and political crises. But that doesn’t change the fundamental problems with a potential U.S. intervention.
There’s the question of legitimacy and international support. Given the current global climate, it’s hard to see the U.S. garnering widespread support for an invasion, particularly in a region where anti-American sentiment already runs high. This makes a move feel brazen at best.
The potential for escalation is alarming. Any military intervention risks a spiral of violence and instability. What starts as a limited operation could quickly escalate into a larger conflict, potentially involving other regional players. The level of preparation that Venezuela has undertaken for possible intervention is something that cannot be ignored. The potential for a long and difficult insurgency is very real.
There is a sense that the U.S. might be taking a more aggressive stance, possibly at the expense of its own credibility and long-term interests. We see an erosion of international norms and principles. This is a very precarious position for the United States.
Many believe that the U.S. is operating with a desire for complete control over its hemisphere. The presence of an amphibious assault ship in the Caribbean underscores that concern.
Ultimately, the situation in Venezuela is a powder keg. The presence of the “Night Stalkers” in the Caribbean is a clear indication that the U.S. is actively considering its options. What those options are, and how they will play out, remains to be seen. However, the potential for a U.S. intervention, and the far-reaching consequences that could entail, is a cause for considerable concern.