By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Reports indicate the U.S. military has conducted at least one strike in the Caribbean targeting Colombian nationals on a boat that originated in Colombia. This suggests the U.S. military’s anti-narcotics campaign is more extensive than previously disclosed, with the administration justifying lethal strikes against suspected drug traffickers. The legal basis for these actions has been questioned, raising concerns about oversight and accountability, as the Trump administration continues to address illegal drug flow in the region. Furthermore, the U.S. has also authorized the CIA to operate inside Venezuela to clamp down on illegal flows of migrants and drugs.
Read the original article here
At least one US military strike on alleged drug trafficking boat in Caribbean targeted Colombians. That statement, on its own, feels jarring, doesn’t it? The US military, a force often associated with defending against clear external threats, is now apparently involved in targeted strikes against boats in the Caribbean, and at least one of those strikes involved Colombians. What’s even more unsettling is that the details are sparse, almost intentionally vague, leaving a lot of room for suspicion and speculation. The core question keeps coming up: is this justified?
The most concerning aspect is the lack of transparency. No public evidence, no definitive proof, has been offered to justify these strikes. Are we talking about confirmed drug smuggling operations, or is this based on circumstantial evidence? The information provided suggests a “suspected of carrying” scenario, which, frankly, feels like a flimsy basis for taking human lives. It raises fundamental questions about due process and the legal justification for treating alleged drug smugglers as “enemy combatants,” especially when they haven’t been convicted of anything. The legal system is supposed to determine guilt or innocence, not a military strike.
Then there’s the whole “enemy combatant” label, which raises flags. Even if these individuals *were* involved in drug smuggling, is that a capital offense? In the US, it’s not. So what exactly gives the military the authority to declare them enemies and kill them? Furthermore, the fact that the Pentagon couldn’t confirm the identities of the people on the boats before striking them adds a layer of chilling ambiguity. It’s a disturbing echo of the drone strikes in the Middle East. The possibility that innocent civilians are being targeted, or the sheer lack of a clear definition of who is being targeted, should alarm everyone.
The fact that Colombia is a Major Non-NATO Ally complicates matters. The US has a close relationship with Colombia, which makes it all the more difficult to understand this type of action. Are we engaging in an undeclared war against a second sovereign nation? With zero public accountability and no real consequences? This raises questions that desperately need to be answered.
The prospect of these actions, potentially illegal ones, being carried out without oversight is alarming. One has to ask, who is supposed to question the legality of these orders? And even if someone does, what recourse do they have? Can anyone trust the military to refuse unlawful orders? The situation seems ripe for abuse, especially if those in positions of power are willing to push the boundaries of legality.
The potential for political manipulation is also a valid concern. The possibility of pardons for those involved in the strikes, should the political tides shift, is a worrying thought. It suggests a willingness to sidestep accountability and potentially protect those who may have committed serious crimes.
It’s easy to imagine this is just the beginning. The scenario of a “safari” for drug traffickers seems absurd. The scale of these alleged operations, with speedboats used to carry drugs from South America to America, feels like a cartoonish oversimplification of a complex issue. And what’s even stranger is that it is happening without massive arrests at any ports. This whole situation smells of something much bigger.
The whole situation feels like a protection racket. And the timing, with the alleged strikes occurring as the world’s attention is elsewhere, feels particularly suspicious. It also brings to mind the history of US involvement in drug-related conflicts in South America, a history that’s rarely been one of pure altruism. It is difficult to feel like those on the boat were narco-traffickers when these details are so sparse.
Finally, there’s the question of why these details are so vague. The lack of transparency, the reluctance to provide details, and the speed with which these strikes are carried out all raise red flags. It’s as if there’s a deliberate effort to keep the public in the dark. The fact that these individuals are nameless and faceless, that their deaths have been painted without context, is chilling. We are left to wonder about the lives that have been lost, the families that have been affected, and the true motives behind these actions.