By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Trump has declared an “armed conflict” with drug cartels, viewing them as terrorists and paving the way for increased military action. A confidential memo sent to Congress revealed this decision, giving Trump more authority for lethal strikes. This declaration follows deadly strikes against alleged drug smuggling boats, sparking concerns about legality and a dramatic escalation of military power. The administration claims these actions are part of a campaign against “narco-terrorists” and to stop the flow of illegal drugs into the U.S.
Read the original article here
Trump Secretly Admits He Has Started a New War? The idea sparks immediate questions. It’s not really “secret” when the language he uses is so openly aggressive. The truth is, he’s been publicly stoking division and inciting conflict for years. The rhetoric of “war” has been a constant companion, and it’s hard to ignore the patterns.
The very definition of “war” becomes fluid when you consider the context. What constitutes a war, really? Is it just battles with physical weapons, or does it extend to the constant bombardment of the population with targeted hate speech and policies designed to divide? Consider the policies that threaten specific groups, turning against perceived enemies. It’s a tactic designed to create fear and make people feel like they are under attack. Are we surprised, then, that Trump is framing a war?
It’s also worth noting the deliberate vagueness of the language. Instead of naming specific organizations, we get references to “enemies of the state.” This ambiguity allows the target to be broadened, and the scope of the “war” can be expanded at will. Phrases like “trans identity inspired violence” are dangerous because they can be used to target marginalized groups and anyone who supports them. It’s all about increasing the power of those in charge.
The actions he is taking seem like a test. Bombing boats? It feels like the beginning of something far more sinister. The “enemy within” narrative is being primed. And this isn’t subtle. His constant talk of “war” – “Department of War,” “war with Chicago,” “war from within,” and “war with cartels” – makes it very clear what he is trying to achieve. The language is designed to inflame passions and create a climate of fear.
Furthermore, if Trump truly believes he has started a war, it’s worth questioning who he would target. He has the whole country fighting against itself. The power to declare war rests with Congress, not an individual. This is deeply worrying. His history of ignoring the rules and norms suggests that his actions will continue.
This isn’t just a matter of rhetoric; it’s about the potential abuse of emergency powers. There’s a long history of foretelling of how the executive branch could become a dictatorship, relying on trust in a constitutional structure. This is where the discussion of a “war” becomes especially dangerous. The idea of a “war within” is alarming, because it could be used to justify the suspension of civil liberties and the suppression of dissent.
The constant emphasis on the “war” is not accidental. He knows exactly what he is doing. He uses the tactic of trying to get wealthy people away from a place so they will not be hurt. He might start a war so he can say, there won’t be elections during the war. He’s seeking a reason to consolidate power, and a manufactured crisis is the perfect tool.
The potential targets are wide. Is it a war against domestic groups or against specific citizens? He is using the idea of war to justify his actions. He knows what he is doing: trying to justify his takeover using the Insurrection Act. He is seeking a crisis that will let him grab even more power.
Then there’s the irony. He seeks to be known as the “president of peace” while simultaneously inciting the very violence he pretends to oppose. It’s all about manipulating public perception. This isn’t about peace; it’s about power. The potential for abuse is staggering, and the consequences could be devastating.
He is testing to see how far he can push it, and the reaction of the population is the key. The silence is deafening. He is following the same tactics as many authoritarians throughout history. The fear of a civil war is palpable, and his supporters are not worried, because he will control the narrative and the response.
In short, the idea of Trump secretly starting a new war isn’t really “secret.” It is being openly stated. The language he is using, the policies he is promoting, and the potential targets he has in mind all point to a disturbing reality. The constant talk of “war” creates a dangerous environment where abuses of power become easier to justify and the very fabric of democracy is threatened. It is up to the citizens to recognize the threat and to defend their rights before it is too late.