By John Q. Hosedrinker 
During a recent address aboard the USS George Washington in Japan, the president expressed his misunderstanding of magnet technology, particularly in relation to aircraft carrier systems. He claimed water could disable magnets, a concept he has voiced for at least 18 months. The president vowed to issue an executive order to revert to steam catapults and hydraulic elevators. This anti-magnet sentiment was also linked to concerns about China’s supposed dominance in the global magnet market, despite the historical use of magnets in ancient China.
Read the original article here
Trump, 79, Gets Confused Explaining Water to the Navy, and it’s difficult to process this level of confusion, isn’t it? It seems almost surreal, the idea of a former president, at the age of 79, struggling to articulate something so fundamental as how water interacts with… magnets. Specifically, in the context of explaining modern technology to the Navy. It’s not just a slip of the tongue; it’s a rambling discourse that leaves listeners, and perhaps even himself, bewildered. The core of the issue stems from the Navy’s adoption of electromagnetic catapults for aircraft carriers, a technologically advanced system. But the narrative quickly veers off course, transforming into a muddled discussion about water, magnets, and something akin to a conspiracy involving hydraulic systems. The whole scene feels more like a scene out of a bad comedy than a presidential address.
The irony here is almost palpable. The core of the confusion appears to be stemming from a new technology using magnets. Trump, in his explanations, seems to suggest there’s a risk of water somehow causing the system to fail. He literally admitted that he doesn’t know what happens when magnets get wet. This isn’t just a minor gaffe; it highlights a profound lack of understanding of a crucial piece of naval technology. And what makes it all the more jarring is the contrast between the complexity of the technology and the simplicity of the subject matter—water. The image of the Navy, a highly sophisticated organization, having to listen to this kind of explanation is… well, it’s hard to imagine anyone taking it seriously. It also makes you wonder about the people who are in the room. What are their internal thoughts as they listen?
One cannot help but note the comments, especially when they mention the different standards applied to Trump’s public appearances versus those of other politicians. The assertion that this type of performance would be headline news if it were another individual is impossible to ignore. There’s a pointedness to the observation about how the media handles the cognitive abilities of different political figures. It is not wrong to bring up the hypocrisy. The comparison offers a stark contrast in how similar issues might be perceived and reported depending on the individual in question. This discrepancy, rightly or wrongly, is a very real element of the political landscape.
Of course, the comments also touch on broader concerns about Trump’s fitness for leadership. There’s a palpable sense of worry, even frustration, with what is perceived as a decline in cognitive function. The description of his speech as “gibberish” and his mental state as “fried” paint a rather damning picture. You get this sense that his health, or lack of it, is a huge factor. The idea of someone in his condition having access to the nuclear codes is particularly troubling and highlights the high stakes involved. The fact that the people around him appear to either ignore or enable this behavior raises even more uncomfortable questions.
Moreover, there’s a persistent critique of the “yes men” surrounding Trump. The notion that his inner circle is afraid or unwilling to challenge him, even when he’s demonstrably wrong, is a recurring theme. The comments suggest that this lack of dissent creates an environment where his misconceptions and flawed ideas can thrive unchallenged. This is a very common observation about those in the most powerful positions and those closest to them. The resulting impact on his decisions, his actions, and the overall governance of the country is, according to the comments, potentially dangerous. It is, therefore, the people around him who must also be held accountable.
It’s also interesting to note how some of the comments frame the situation as a manifestation of a deeper problem: a kind of narcissistic worldview where admitting being wrong is simply not an option. The idea is that Trump’s confidence and apparent self-belief prevent him from acknowledging any limitations in his knowledge or understanding. The comments suggest that this leads to a situation where he becomes increasingly isolated in his own, often inaccurate, perception of reality. If the world is perceived to be the way he says, then everyone else is wrong, and that’s that. This isn’t a matter of simply being misinformed; it’s a worldview that is resistant to correction.
Ultimately, the confusion surrounding Trump’s explanation of water to the Navy raises some serious questions. It’s a moment that captures his current state and the dynamics of those around him. It makes one think about the implications of the state of the United States and the very real dangers it may face. The whole thing really is… something.