By John Q. Hosedrinker 
During a flight to Israel, former President Donald Trump praised Qatar’s role in mediating a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas. Trump inaccurately stated that Qatar’s proximity to Iran made the negotiations difficult, falsely claiming one could simply “walk over” in a second. This geographical misstatement was met with immediate criticism on social media. He also discussed his shifting perspective on Qatar, emphasizing their contributions to the deal and framing the achievement as a significant part of his legacy.
Read the original article here
Donald Trump, 79, Skewered for Embarrassing Geographical Flub, the president clearly didn’t have access to a map, or at least, he didn’t consult one before making some rather outlandish statements. This whole situation highlights a recurring theme, doesn’t it? The man, who is now nearing his 80s, consistently seems to stumble over basic facts, and in this case, it was geography that tripped him up. It raises the question: how can someone in such a high-profile position, dealing with international relations, be so remarkably unaware of something so fundamental as the distance between two countries?
The specific gaffe involved Trump’s comments on the proximity of Iran and Qatar. According to the accounts, he suggested they were practically next door, maybe a quick walk away, a “boom boom” and you’re there kind of deal. Now, anyone who has ever glanced at a globe or, you know, used a search engine knows this is wildly inaccurate. In reality, they are hundreds of miles apart, separated by the Persian Gulf, and a significant journey even by car or plane. The fact that this sort of misstatement made its way into the public domain is just another piece of evidence.
It’s not just a one-off incident either. Over the course of his career, Trump has made numerous similar errors, demonstrating a pattern of geographical ignorance. It makes you wonder how someone so seemingly clueless can find himself at the helm. Some people are suggesting that he might be experiencing mental lapses. Other commenters have gone as far as to say that Trump was the dumbest person to have ever been elected president, even before his brain “started rotting away.” The lack of curiosity in general makes this more concerning.
The reaction to these blunders is often a mix of disbelief, amusement, and, let’s be honest, a bit of exasperation. People are “skewering” him, “slamming” him, but is there really a point? The fact is he’s making these statements. The words are the story. It doesn’t come as a shock to those who have followed his public appearances. It seems that he never really read any of the briefing documents. How do you mediate and work out deals with other countries, while simultaneously showing blatant disregard for the basic facts of those countries and their proximities?
Some have suggested it all boils down to the fact that he simply doesn’t read or educate himself. Someone pointed out that Trump’s reliance on other people’s assessments and his ability to misinterpret and then overstate information points to a lack of understanding about the world. It’s hard to imagine that someone who doesn’t have a solid grasp of geography would be particularly good at, say, formulating foreign policy.
The situation does seem to highlight a broader issue, particularly about the quality of journalism and the way these events are reported. The hyperbole used in the headlines and the general tone of some news outlets can be excessive. Are we getting real news, or is it just clickbait? People are calling out the “Daily Beast,” for example.
The whole thing also begs the question, does he not have access to a map? Does he not have a globe? Maybe, and this is just speculation, he doesn’t want to look at a map because he knows how to color the ones that he has. Or, maybe he just doesn’t see the point.
Perhaps it’s the age, and perhaps it’s a lack of basic understanding, but whatever the reason, these incidents continue to happen. They are, without a doubt, an embarrassment. Whether or not they will change anything remains to be seen, but it is clear that the narrative is well established.