By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Trump recently urged both Kyiv and Moscow to halt the war where they are and suggested that they allow each side to claim victory. Following a White House meeting with Ukrainian President Zelenskyy, Trump signaled a change in his stance on the war, leaning against providing Ukraine with long-range Tomahawk missiles, which Zelenskyy sought to gain an advantage in the conflict. This shift in rhetoric came after a phone call with Russian President Putin, during which the leader warned that providing Ukraine with Tomahawks would damage the relationship between the countries. These actions represent a divergence from Trump’s prior openness to helping Ukraine win and highlight his ongoing efforts to broker a peace deal.
Read the original article here
After Zelenskyy meeting, Trump calls on Ukraine and Russia to ‘stop where they are’ and end the war, and it’s a statement that immediately raises eyebrows, to say the least. It’s a call that essentially implies Moscow should keep the territory it’s seized from Kyiv, which is, frankly, a massive problem. It’s hard to ignore that this stance, if implemented, would reward aggression and undermine the very principles of international law. The implications of such a position are far-reaching and deeply concerning, especially when considering the devastating consequences of the ongoing conflict.
This sentiment feels like a stark contrast to any meaningful efforts towards peace. It completely misses the point that the war isn’t just about territory; it’s about the sovereignty and survival of Ukraine and the global order. It’s akin to suggesting that a burglar and a homeowner should just ‘stop where they are’ after the robbery has taken place, with the burglar retaining the stolen goods. The absurdity of it is glaring, and it’s difficult to see how such a declaration contributes to a just or lasting resolution.
The implications for Ukraine are devastating. It also provides zero incentive for Russia to stop their aggression. Why would they when they’re offered the spoils of war? Such a proposal completely disregards the suffering, loss of life, and destruction that Russia has inflicted. It’s not a solution, it’s a surrender disguised as a peace offering. It’s hard to imagine Ukraine agreeing to anything of the sort, and rightly so.
One thing that immediately jumps to mind is, it would legitimize further aggression from other actors. It would signal to the world that if you’re strong enough, you can take what you want, and the international community won’t stand in your way. This is not the message we want to send, and it completely undermines any pretense of upholding the rule of law. It’s a dangerous precedent that could destabilize the entire global system.
The core of the issue is that it incentivizes continued adventurism by other powers, emboldening those with imperialistic ambitions. It’s essentially saying, “Go ahead, take what you want, and maybe, just maybe, we’ll tell everyone to just accept it.” This is a recipe for more conflict, not less, as it would clearly lead to further instability and suffering. It’s a deeply irresponsible position to take, especially from someone who has held a position of global influence.
Putin, for one, would likely be thrilled. This position gives him exactly what he wants: a validation of his actions and a reward for his aggression. It’s difficult to see how this would lead to anything other than a continued stalemate at best, and further expansion of the conflict at worst. It ignores the reality of the situation on the ground, the needs of the Ukrainian people, and the interests of the international community.
The reality is, Russia needs to get out of Ukraine. Full stop. There’s no compromise here. You don’t reward bad behavior. You condemn it, and you ensure it doesn’t happen again. The suggestion to ‘stop where they are’ is a way of legitimizing the invasion and denying Ukraine’s right to its own territory and its own future.
The potential for exploitation is also a key factor. Countries and entities ready to swoop in and leverage any resulting weakness to ensure Russia keeps its gains should not be incentivized. This could include further conflict if there is no strong pushback. No, Russia needs to leave Ukraine. It’s very simple.
One cannot help but wonder what exactly is being said behind closed doors. It’s hard to reconcile this statement with any serious attempt to resolve the conflict. It’s a declaration that is completely out of touch with the reality of the situation and the needs of the people affected by it. And it’s a sentiment that simply cannot be accepted.
Ultimately, this statement reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of the conflict. It reveals a lack of empathy for the Ukrainian people and a complete disregard for the principles of international law. It’s a position that’s not only wrong, but dangerous, and a betrayal of the values that the world should stand for.