By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Recent Supreme Court decisions have granted the president significant control over the executive branch, effectively allowing President Trump to demand the Justice Department transfer $230 million in taxpayer funds to his personal account. This power stems from the Supreme Court’s reinterpretation of the Constitution under Chief Justice John Roberts, establishing a unitary executive theory. While Trump claims these payments are compensation for investigations into his past actions, the article questions the ethical implications, especially as the DOJ officials involved were formerly Trump’s lawyers. This situation illustrates concerns about corruption and the potential for Trump to exploit this power for personal gain, with further implications if he gains control of other government entities like the Federal Reserve.
Read the original article here
As Trump plans to steal $230 million from taxpayers, we can thank John Roberts for helping to set the stage for such a blatant act. It’s almost unbelievable, this idea of extracting such a vast sum, more than the combined salaries of every U.S. president across the nation’s history, and it’s happening under the guise of perceived wrongdoings. The audacity is staggering, especially when considering the reasons being cited. It’s a blatant power grab, reminiscent of the tactics employed by dictators who amass wealth through their position, using the system to their advantage.
The very framework that enables this kind of maneuver, the “clear and effective chain of command” from the President, is being exploited. The irony is thick. The notion that he deserves this money, that he has been wronged, is a smokescreen. It’s a distraction from the fundamental act of robbing the country. It’s a calculated move to enrich himself, plain and simple. And let’s be honest, the idea of him donating it is hardly comforting. The whole charade is a well-orchestrated performance.
One cannot forget the influence of the Supreme Court, and John Roberts’ position within it. George W. Bush, seemingly the gift that keeps on giving, and who appointed Roberts, continues to influence the present. From the Iraq War and the financial meltdown, to the rulings like Citizens United, Bush’s legacy has been a major contributor to the current political landscape. Roberts’ presence on the Supreme Court is significant, influencing the legal interpretations that permit Trump to operate with seemingly reckless disregard for the law. Trump has been openly defying laws for years and Roberts’ court seems to be offering a green light.
Trump’s proposed theft of $230 million isn’t getting the outrage it merits. He is allegedly guilty of serious charges, including inciting an insurrection, retaining classified documents, and colluding with Russia. And yet, instead of facing consequences, he’s poised to profit handsomely. It’s a complete inversion of justice, where the alleged criminal walks away with a massive payout. This is not justice; it is the perversion of justice. The very idea that Trump could extract $230 million from the DOJ is made possible by those like Pam Bondi, the enablers, and the voters who continue to support him.
This entire situation has echoes of a heist movie where the plan is simply to demand the money. The fact that this could even be considered in earnest is a testament to the current state of affairs. This is not just about Trump; it’s about the systemic failures that have allowed such corruption to take root. People are losing faith in the systems of the nation. It should be our money that’s being taken. One cannot simply stand by and watch this happen.
The question of who to blame is critical. It’s not just Trump; it’s the voters, the entire GOP, and the sixteen years of questionable choices that have brought us here. We’ve reached a point where accountability is practically non-existent. The Judges also bear responsibility for this entire situation. The fact that the ruling could be considered unconstitutional, yet seemingly unstoppable, is a critical issue.
It raises questions about the motivations of those in power. What does he even need $230 million more for? It’s not about need; it’s about power and control. It’s about solidifying his base and portraying himself as a victim, further polarizing the nation. It also underscores how those in power can manipulate the system to protect themselves.
This is a crisis of trust. It’s an entitlement to our money, that we work for, and should be beyond criminal. This is what we need to take back. This is what needs to be fixed. The system is broken. We need to demand more. The voters and the judiciary bear responsibility here.