By Matt Underwood Trump says he is not considering strikes within Venezuela, which, if we’re being honest, probably means the exact opposite is true. The general consensus here, and it’s hard to disagree, is that when he declares he *isn’t* doing something, the likelihood of that thing happening increases exponentially. It’s like a reverse psychology power play. He’s said it before, right? Remember Iran? He was all about waiting and negotiating, and then… well, the bombs started falling practically overnight. So, based on past performance, “not considering” usually translates to “already decided” and “in the process of execution.”
When Trump says he is not considering strikes within Venezuela, it feels less like a statement of fact and more like a carefully crafted smokescreen. The evidence leans heavily towards the idea that plans are already in motion, possibly even that the strikes are imminent. The fact that the USS Ford, one of the most advanced aircraft carriers in the world, is reportedly en route, seems less like a leisurely cruise and more like a very pointed, and expensive, warning sign. You don’t send a carrier halfway across the globe for a casual vacation.
So, when Trump says he is not considering strikes within Venezuela, we should probably prepare for the opposite. The logic here is simple: he’s a known liar. A pathological one, even. And, as we all know, lying is his go-to communication style. You can’t consider something you’ve already decided to do. The decision, in the minds of those observing, has already been made. It’s a done deal, sealed with a lie, and likely, a military order. The only real question left seems to be *when* the bombs will drop, not *if*.
Trump says he is not considering strikes within Venezuela, but he also has a history of promising one thing and doing another, especially when it comes to military action. This isn’t a new phenomenon. He promised to drain the swamp, end the endless wars, and yet here we are, possibly on the brink of another military operation. The inconsistency is the consistency. It’s a pattern of deceit, and unfortunately, it’s what people have come to expect.
When Trump says he is not considering strikes within Venezuela, one must consider this as part of a larger strategy. Some think it’s information warfare, designed to sow confusion and create uncertainty. Others suspect that Stephen Miller might be the puppeteer, pulling the strings and making decisions behind the scenes. Whatever the truth, the effect is the same: the announcement of “no strikes” likely means strikes are coming. It’s a classic case of inverse logic.
When Trump says he is not considering strikes within Venezuela, it’s a signal to brace for impact. The skepticism here is universal. The idea that he’s actually telling the truth is laughable. This is a man who thrives on chaos and deception. He might be banking on the element of surprise, but, based on the observations and past patterns, it’s a surprise to absolutely no one.
Trump says he is not considering strikes within Venezuela, and that just solidifies the suspicion that the strikes are on the horizon. The phrase “special military operation” has a particular tone that is familiar, even though it’s always followed by denial. It’s a warning sign, a premonition of sorts. It might be as simple as “Trump lies,” and that’s usually enough to know what is coming.
When Trump says he is not considering strikes within Venezuela, you’ve got to take the inverse. One might anticipate news, bad news, to be released on Friday. The collective feeling is that we’re about to see the beginning of something.