By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In response to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, the U.S. Treasury and the European Union have both levied new sanctions against Russia to increase economic pressure on Moscow. The U.S. sanctions target major Russian oil companies, aiming to limit their revenue and support for the war effort. The E.U.’s 19th package of measures includes restrictions on various sectors, such as energy, military, and finance, as well as those involved in the abduction of Ukrainian children. Both the U.S. and the E.U. have warned of further sanctions if Russia does not agree to a cease-fire. Russia has strongly condemned the sanctions, while Ukraine has welcomed the measures as a step towards peace.
Read the original article here
Trump and the E.U. impose new sanctions on Russia: ‘Now Is the Time to Stop the Killing.’ Well, here we are, finally. The headlines are screaming about new sanctions, a move designed to squeeze Russia and, hopefully, put an end to the ongoing bloodshed in Ukraine. But, let’s be real, the timing of all this is… well, it’s something.
It’s always been the time to stop the killing, of course. Yet, the persistent feeling is that we’ve been hesitant, tip-toeing around the issue while Russia has been, let’s just say, “active” on its neighbors’ borders. It’s hard not to be cynical, especially when considering the past actions of certain individuals.
Then there’s the Trump factor. It’s hard to ignore the potential for political game-playing, the hope of currying favor from one side or another, likely driven by financial incentives. One can easily picture the scenario: Vladimir calls, a bit of gentle persuasion, and suddenly, the sanctions are gone. End of story, a scenario that, frankly, would be terrifying if it weren’t so predictable. The situation isn’t just about the U.S. and E.U.; it’s Trump and the E.U., with the US seemingly taking a backseat role. And the fact that it took almost four years of some leaders in the US to reach a decision is pretty remarkable.
The immediate reaction is a mix of relief and frustration. A flurry of symbolic gestures, like sending Tomahawks, could have been more effective in crippling Russia’s oil revenues. It’s a case of “better late than never,” though the feeling of “finally” hangs heavy in the air. We need decisive action, but even a small step in the right direction is better than nothing. The issue is whether this is a genuine shift or more political posturing. The worry is that any decision made will be reversed at the slightest provocation, a constant flip-flopping that undermines the entire process.
Given how things often work, the potential for a complete 180-degree turn in policy is ever-present. One minute, it’s sanctions, the next, it’s a push for Ukraine to surrender. This kind of unpredictability, coupled with the reliance on Russian gas by the E.U. (representing almost 15% of the total imports) paints a complicated picture.
EU citizens, perhaps, are also too arrogant and stupid to realize they are single-handedly funding the war in Ukraine, while constantly undercutting the sanctions for their own comfort.
The frustrating reality is that the E.U. seems to know the US will ultimately foot the bill. The quickest solution to this conflict lies within the E.U., yet the implementation of measures is frustratingly slow. It is important to remember that these decisions are not only coming at a late date but also may change drastically.
It’s tempting to think that this might be day one of a new presidency, that the war will be solved by dinner. But history has a way of repeating itself, especially when considering the lack of consistency. Removing the sanctions? Offering Ukraine as a bargaining chip? These are real possibilities. As long as Russia is funded by its neighbors, the US and the EU won’t be able to generate tangible results.
Sanctions alone have never been the magic bullet. Russia is already one of the most sanctioned nations in the world, yet it continues. Any meaningful solution requires direct dialogue. “Good conversations” with Vladimir don’t amount to anything, as the man himself has said. So, what’s the plan?
The sentiment is clear: the best time to stop the killing was years ago. The second best time is now. Offer up a luxury yacht taken during sanctions, and suddenly, a side will be chosen. The situation feels like a stalemate where Russia has lost, but the path out is unclear. And it seems that for some, it is in America’s best interest for the conflict to drag on as long as possible. The longer the conflict continues, the more financial gain there is.
There’s the sense of a relationship souring, with the Kremlin’s insults towards certain leaders, which is new. This, potentially, could lead to unexpected decisions, even sending in Tomahawks. Ultimately, the sanctions are likely more about optics than genuine impact. Russia’s oil production continues, and the current measures will likely have little effect on the war.
The real question is, “Why now?” Why wasn’t it done three years ago? And the answer, as usual, seems to be deeply rooted in politics.