By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Hours before widespread “No Kings” protests, President Trump denied any monarchical aspirations, dismissing claims the government shutdown was timed to coincide with the rallies. This stance contrasts with previous instances where he embraced royal imagery, including a mocked-up Time magazine cover and social media posts. The “No Kings” movement, which builds upon a June demonstration, aims to counter Trump’s perceived authoritarian tendencies. Trump’s recent comments followed his earlier statements and actions, including his comments on becoming Pope, which indicate his shifting position on his regal persona.
Read the original article here
Trump Suddenly Doesn’t Want to Be a King as Massive Protests Loom
It seems the former president has a sudden change of heart, doesn’t he? Suddenly, the man who, not so long ago, seemed to embrace the moniker of “king” is now distancing himself from it. This shift coincides with the impending “No Kings” protests, which are shaping up to be rather large and, understandably, critical of any perceived authoritarian tendencies. It’s almost as if he’s realizing that not everyone is thrilled with the idea of a monarchy.
Of course, the whole situation is rife with irony. He publicly called himself “king” on social media. Perhaps he doesn’t remember this. Or maybe he’s trying to rewrite history to suit his current narrative. Then there’s the fact that he doesn’t want to be a king but a dictator, because kings have a responsibility to their people, while dictators, well, they don’t seem to care.
It’s tempting to see this as a scene straight out of a children’s story, a modern-day “Emperor’s New Clothes” situation. Does it worry his supporters how many people in this country aren’t simply bowing down? One can’t help but wonder if this sudden denial stems from the looming shadow of Project 2025 and the potential for new leadership. This could well be why removing him is so important, because a new administration will continue what he started.
The language of protest is powerful, drawing parallels to historical grievances, reminding us of the foundations of American democracy. They cite specific instances, painting a picture of a leader who disregards laws, undermines the judicial system, and acts with impunity. It’s a sobering reminder of the very freedoms that are potentially at stake.
In his mind, he might not be a king, but this feels like an attempt to pivot away from a narrative that’s gaining traction and criticism. He certainly doesn’t seem to like being unpopular. He remodels the White House to be gaudy, more like Versailles. But, the question remains: is this a genuine change of heart, or a calculated move to mitigate the potential damage from these protests?
The situation is clear: he’s not a king; he’s a dictator. Maybe, in his mind, it’s just a shift in terminology. Perhaps this is about managing perceptions. The protests have a clear message: no kings, no fascists, and a government for the people. His potential for legal troubles and the Epstein files further cast doubt on any claim of good intentions.
It’s almost as if he’s realizing the scope of resistance he’s up against. Even the prospect of the release of certain files could be contributing to this sudden reluctance to embrace any image of absolute power. Does he even know what he wants anymore? Perhaps it’s a sign of vulnerability, a crack in the facade. This may or may not be about being a king. It seems to be more about avoiding accountability.