By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The presidential notice declares the United States is in a noninternational armed conflict with designated terrorist organizations, though specific groups are not named. This broad classification allows the administration to continue unilateral actions against perceived threats. Critics point out that this interpretation stretches international law and could be used to justify violence against loosely organized groups. Experts like Brian Finucane suggest the lack of clarity regarding the targeted groups’ organization creates legal issues.
Read the original article here
Trump Gives Himself Untold Powers With Drug Cartel Declaration
So, this is it, huh? It looks like the plot of a political thriller movie is suddenly becoming our reality. The scenario where the President, in this case, Trump, decides to declare war, not against a nation, but against drug cartels. And, not just any war, but a declaration that seems to grant him sweeping powers, almost as if he’s trying to manufacture a crisis to justify a power grab. It’s the kind of move that makes you wonder about the very foundations of democracy.
The implications are pretty staggering. The argument presented in the “notice” is that cartels are causing the deaths of tens of thousands of Americans each year, and therefore, this equates to an armed attack. But as the experts and the Supreme Court have pointed out, that’s not how it works. Selling a dangerous product, as awful as it is, isn’t the same as an armed attack. Congress hasn’t authorized military force, but Trump’s acting like he has the green light, as if this war is all about flexing authority.
This whole situation raises serious questions about the rule of law and the limits of presidential power. It seems like the administration is blurring the lines, pushing the boundaries of what’s constitutionally permissible. He’s apparently tearing the envelope apart, not stretching it. And the danger isn’t just in the immediate, but also in the precedent being set. What other crises might be used to justify similar expansions of power in the future?
Remember, a key point that cannot be overlooked is that the Supreme Court granted Trump full immunity on July 1, 2024, in a six-three decision. This sets the stage for what we’re seeing now. It’s a scary trajectory and it’s important to consider how this decision enabled all of this to take place. The ability of the president to be above the law is something that the Supreme Court needs to take into strong consideration.
It’s a bit alarming to think about what could come next. Will the election be suspended? Will dissent be considered treason? The fact that the War on Drugs, in its previous iterations, hasn’t exactly been a resounding success should be a warning sign. To declare another one, and give one man so much power, it seems, frankly, reckless. Is this a new attempt to manipulate the system? Is it just a way to rally support? Or is it, as some suggest, a means of consolidating power indefinitely?
Now, with the war on drugs as the justification, Trump can potentially sit in the White House indefinitely. The whole thing stinks of overreach. And it’s tough to imagine that all of this will end well, if it is allowed to continue down this path. It’s almost a given that the cartels will respond. That could lead to real conflict, and the possibility of escalating the fight across borders, drawing in allies and enemies alike.
Consider the people and the countries caught in the crossfire. If there is a military attack, there will be death. There will be violence. And if the cartels respond in kind, what happens then? If it gets bad enough, it could affect how the United States is viewed around the world.
The declaration itself appears to be a cynical move, a way to give cover for actions and attacks that might not otherwise be legal or defensible. There’s a strong feeling that the administration may not have considered how a formal declaration of war against drug cartels could play out in reality.
This seems like a situation where everyone will ultimately lose. The United States will lose its standing in the world, and possibly even its democracy. Citizens will be caught in the crossfire. The military will be stretched. And it all started with a declaration that gave one man untold powers. We need to question the legality of what’s happening, but also the ethics. This could be a descent into something that is not only unconstitutional but also fundamentally, morally wrong. It is all too easy to let the focus shift to the chaos, rather than the danger that it presents.