By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Trump claimed an “insurrection” was underway in Portland, Oregon, and suggested he would consider invoking the Insurrection Act to circumvent a judge’s order and deploy military troops. Despite his claims, city data shows homicides are down, and there were no reports of major unrest or violence. The president appears to be attempting to bypass legal challenges and deploy federal forces under the guise of quelling an uprising, echoing comments from other cities. A judge has ruled the administration used false claims of violence to justify the initial deployment of National Guard troops.
Read the original article here
Trump Now Claims an Insurrection Is Underway in Dark March to Martial Law
The core of the matter boils down to this: Trump is claiming there’s an insurrection, specifically in places like Portland, Oregon. It’s a bold statement, especially considering the context, and the implications are far-reaching. He even suggested he might invoke the Insurrection Act, a move that would allow him to deploy the military against American citizens. This is a serious escalation, a step towards martial law, and it’s crucial to understand why he’s making this claim and what it could mean.
The irony is thick, as many people immediately point out. Trump himself, and his supporters, were involved in a very real attempt to overturn an election, the events of January 6th. So, when he speaks of insurrection, it’s hard not to see a massive dose of projection. He’s accusing others of what he and his allies allegedly tried to do. He seems to be following a well-worn playbook: cause chaos, create fear, and then offer a “solution,” even if that solution involves trampling on constitutional rights.
The specific trigger for this recent claim seems to be the protests, primarily in cities like Portland, Chicago, and others. The protests are in response to federal actions, particularly regarding immigration. Trump has described these protests as “under siege,” despite a lack of widespread violence or rioting. His claims that soldiers “cleaned up” Washington, D.C. and the implied need to do the same in other cities are extremely troubling. It’s important to consider that the definition of insurrection is a mob attempting to overthrow democracy. Trump’s rhetoric seems to be designed to paint these protestors as insurrectionists, thereby justifying the use of the Insurrection Act.
The implications of invoking the Insurrection Act are severe. It allows the president to deploy the military to suppress unrest, which, in effect, bypasses the courts and local authorities. This is a fundamental shift in the balance of power and a significant threat to civil liberties. What’s more, this isn’t just a random idea; there’s evidence that this is a calculated strategy. The idea is to go around the courts by getting enough “manufactured civil disobedience” to justify it.
The arguments against Trump’s claims and potential actions are substantial. Critics emphasize that the protests have largely remained peaceful and that local leaders, including those in Portland, are not requesting federal intervention. The fact that a judge, appointed by Trump himself, has blocked the initial deployment of National Guard troops further highlights the lack of justification for invoking the Insurrection Act. There’s a sense that this is a power grab, an attempt to consolidate control and undermine the democratic process.
One cannot ignore the underlying political strategy. Trump is facing a possible loss if the status quo remains and midterms are to be held. Perhaps, he’s attempting to create a crisis atmosphere. It’s a well-worn tactic: make the situation appear desperate, portray opponents as enemies, and then offer a strong-arm solution. The danger is that this could lead to further polarization, increased violence, and a profound erosion of democratic norms. Some think he may cancel the election.
The call for preparation, including food, water, and weapons, in response to this situation, reflects the very real fears that are rising. While it’s reasonable to be prepared for unforeseen events, it’s important to remain calm and thoughtful. Those advocating this kind of preparation are doing so because they’re anticipating a breakdown of civil order, including potential economic collapse and even military action against the American people.
The situation is undoubtedly tense, and the stakes are high. Trump’s rhetoric and potential actions are not just political games; they represent a direct challenge to the foundations of American democracy. The path ahead is uncertain, but the need for vigilance, critical thinking, and a commitment to democratic principles is more critical than ever.