By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In response to criticism of the president’s use of social media, Speaker Johnson defended his strategy. He argued the president uses social media effectively, leveraging satire to make his points, unlike those allegedly calling for violence against political opponents. Johnson further criticized a recent rally, falsely labeling it as anti-American, while highlighting its peaceful nature and the irony of its organizers’ stance. He contrasted the rally’s demands with the actions of a hypothetical king, pointing out how President Trump’s influence, if he were a king, would have shut down the event.
Read the original article here
Trump Demolishes Part of White House as He Builds His Tacky Ballroom. The sheer audacity of it all, isn’t it? To think, while the country grapples with divisions and the very fabric of government seems to be fraying, there he is, purportedly demolishing a part of the White House to build a lavish, gold-draped ballroom. The symbolism is almost too on the nose; a physical manifestation of a man prioritizing his personal indulgences while, perhaps, the country falls apart around him. It’s a scene that’s begging for a metaphor, but one struggles to even begin to articulate the depths of it all.
Trump Demolishes Part of White House as He Builds His Tacky Ballroom. The image itself, the mock-up, is unsettling. The supposed removal of windows, the grand scale of the space…it’s not a subtle statement. It’s a declaration. Some are noticing that the “conservatives” are the ones literally demolishing one of America’s most recognizable symbols. It’s a deliberate act, a flaunting of power, and a testament to the notion that the rules don’t apply, or worse, that they can be rewritten. The fact that this is all happening while the country is supposedly going through some kind of crisis, is not lost on anyone.
Trump Demolishes Part of White House as He Builds His Tacky Ballroom. The visual contrast is stark and disturbing. The gilded Oval Office, the garish ballroom renderings, all juxtaposed with reports (and potential realities) of detention centers reminiscent of something out of a history book. It’s a disturbing picture of someone who appears to be embracing what could be called autocratic tendencies. What’s even more perplexing is the apparent lack of self-awareness. It’s a bewildering irony to hear complaints of persecution from the very people actively engaged in consolidating power and suppressing dissent.
Trump Demolishes Part of White House as He Builds His Tacky Ballroom. The idea that this is just a renovation, a simple addition, is almost laughable. It’s not about leaving a legacy, this is about a permanent residence. The scale, the extravagance, the sheer waste of resources in a time of national division, screams of a deeper intent. The White House already has ample space; a 90,000 square foot ballroom is not a need. It’s an indulgence, an ego trip. The echoes of “Let them eat cake” are deafening.
Trump Demolishes Part of White House as He Builds His Tacky Ballroom. This isn’t just a waste of money; it’s a profound insult. A $250 million gold-plated ballroom, while the country faces countless other challenges? It’s a slap in the face. It’s a deliberate provocation, a statement of disdain for the very people the presidency is supposed to serve. The idea of the next President having to undo all of this, to remove the “stain from history,” is an interesting and pertinent point. The hope is that it will be put to use for good.
Trump Demolishes Part of White House as He Builds His Tacky Ballroom. It’s not just the ballroom itself, it’s what it represents: a complete disregard for the office and the history it embodies. There’s no appreciation for heritage, no respect for the past. Just a desire to impose one’s own will, one’s own aesthetics, no matter the cost or the consequences. Remember his words of respect and love for the existing building, his claim that the ballroom wouldn’t interfere? Well, the pictures tell a different story.
Trump Demolishes Part of White House as He Builds His Tacky Ballroom. How old is the section of the White House that is supposedly being altered? Is it being renovated or destroyed? The implications of a man “nesting,” building a permanent residence, are chilling. It’s hard not to recall those moments in history where symbols of power and oppression were toppled. One could suggest a demolition and a memorial of sorts in a future. It seems likely that the next administration will have a significant bill to settle. And the idea that taxpayer money is being used to fuel his ego is particularly galling.
Trump Demolishes Part of White House as He Builds His Tacky Ballroom. The brazenness of the whole thing is almost unbelievable. His actions are not the sign of someone who intends to depart. The intent of a large ballroom suggests extravagant parties, large events, and it certainly won’t be a place for a quiet life. The question is how long this will go on, and what will remain once he departs. The irony that the people supporting this are the same who accuse others of corruption and abuse of power, is not lost on observers. It’s a perfect illustration of how he is allegedly destroying a country.
Trump Demolishes Part of White House as He Builds His Tacky Ballroom. The need for a third term is often discussed, and while that may be said to rile up opponents, there may be some truth to it. The GOP has been known to cast aside families once they outlive their usefulness, and that may be his end game. It’s understandable that his supporters will do everything they can while he is still in office, including anything that may be illegal, in order to make money. It is a sign of a decaying society to stand by and watch this happen, but it does.
Trump Demolishes Part of White House as He Builds His Tacky Ballroom. It’s hard not to imagine the next administration having to dismantle all of this. What will happen to the ballroom? It will be removed, and that cost will not be as much to pay after Trump leaves office. The whole project feels like an attack on democracy, one brick at a time. The fact that the design may lack the level of aesthetic appeal is another point. It is a sign of an ego with gilded rage.