By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A 67-year-old U.S. citizen allegedly suffered serious injuries, including broken ribs and internal bleeding, after being forcibly removed from his car by federal agents during an immigration sweep. The incident occurred in front of children and was captured on video, leading to public outrage. The man’s injuries required hospitalization, and he is reportedly considering legal action against the Department of Homeland Security. This event is part of a broader crackdown in Chicago, led by Border Patrol, which has sparked legal battles and accusations of excessive force. Court rulings have been made, attempting to limit aggressive tactics by the agents.
Read the original article here
Trump Border Patrol Goons Alleged to Break Ribs of U.S. Man, 67, at Kids’ Halloween Party
Okay, let’s unpack this unsettling story. We’re talking about a 67-year-old U.S. citizen who, according to reports, had his ribs broken and suffered internal bleeding during an incident involving Border Patrol agents. This alleged event took place during a children’s Halloween party, which adds a particularly disturbing layer to the situation. It’s hard not to be shocked by the picture painted here.
One of the immediate and most concerning aspects that stands out is the alleged disregard for due process. The narrative presents a scenario where federal agents are acting with apparent impunity, dragging a U.S. citizen from his car and using force without clear justification. This raises serious questions about the agents’ actions and whether the agency’s internal protocols were followed. The suggestion of a hostile crowd is something that does not make this incident better.
The description of the agents’ gear – gas masks and automatic weapons – and the location of the incident, a quiet residential area, create a stark contrast. The fact that this occurred during a kid’s Halloween party adds an additional layer of disturbance. It’s not the kind of image one would expect to see in a neighborhood filled with nice homes. Some people even call it a terrorist act.
The fact that the victim was a U.S. citizen is critical here, making this case very different from a situation involving an undocumented immigrant. The argument being made is that this citizen had rights that were violated. The idea that someone can be treated this way in their own neighborhood is horrifying.
It’s clear that many people have strong feelings about this. One recurring theme in the comments is the lack of accountability. People are expressing frustration about the perceived lack of oversight of these agents, and the difficulty in bringing them to justice. The victim’s lawyer’s statement about not being able to press charges is particularly disheartening.
Then there’s the broader context of the political climate. Some individuals see this as part of a larger pattern of actions, a demonstration of what is referred to as “the Republican’s America.” Comments suggest it is their supporters who want this to happen. The phrase “ethnic cleansing” appears, pointing to the underlying biases and motivations driving such actions.
This incident seems to have triggered a sense of fear and unease, with people talking about the potential for violence and escalating tensions. Some individuals are expressing concern about the erosion of civil liberties and the increasingly militarized approach to immigration enforcement. The question of when, if ever, this will stop is a common sentiment in the comments.
The comments also reflect a deep sense of betrayal. The government, according to these comments, is the enemy. There is a sense of powerlessness and that there’s nothing that can be done to stop it.
The mention of the Second Amendment is interesting, as it raises questions about the role of firearms in a society where the government is perceived as overreaching. Will this become a hot civil war?
This incident, and the responses to it, highlight the profound divisions and anxieties present in today’s society. People are questioning the very foundations of justice and fairness. The notion that “silence is approval” speaks volumes about the level of anger and frustration.
It’s evident that there are diverse viewpoints on this incident, but the common thread is concern about the use of force, lack of oversight, and the impact on civil liberties.
In a fair society, one is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. This should not be a country where one branch of government is judge, jury and executioner. It’s a sad state of affairs when people feel that violence might be the only answer.