By John Q. Hosedrinker 
According to Michael Wolff, Donald Trump secretly orchestrated the demolition of the White House’s East Wing with the goal of constructing a new ballroom. Trump reportedly considered demolishing the historic building under the cover of night to avoid public outcry. Despite this plan failing, the administration still attempted to conceal the damage by prohibiting federal employees from sharing demolition photos and by erecting a high fence around the construction site. It is also believed that the new ballroom, which will be much larger than the Executive Residence, will be named the Trump Ballroom.
Read the original article here
Trump Ordered Secret East Wing Teardown in F-Word Rant: Author, according to a recent report, reveals a particularly brazen episode during his presidency. The crux of the matter revolves around a purported plan to demolish the White House’s East Wing, a historical structure, under the cloak of secrecy.
The narrative, as presented by author Michael Wolff, suggests that this audacious scheme was born out of a desire to expedite the construction of a new ballroom. Apparently, engineers informed Trump that razing the existing East Wing would be the most efficient way to achieve this. The price tag for the ballroom was a hefty $300 million, a detail that further highlights the magnitude of the project.
The focus, however, wasn’t on the historical implications of potentially erasing a 123-year-old building. Instead, the primary concern, as Wolff alleges, was how to keep the demolition hidden from the public’s view. This priority, according to the account, led to a rather revealing response from the former president.
Quoting a source, Wolff claims Trump reacted with, and I quote, “F—. But can we do the demolition at night?” This single sentence encapsulates the alleged mindset: a disregard for historical preservation coupled with a desperate attempt to maintain secrecy, even if it meant attempting to pull off such a feat under the cover of darkness. The co-host of the podcast, Joanna Coles, noted the absurdity: the idea of Washington waking up to an evaporated East Wing.
The potential ramifications of such an action are staggering. Imagine the outcry if a wing of the White House, a symbol of American history, simply vanished overnight. The level of audacity, the apparent lack of concern for public perception, and the casual use of profanity paint a picture of a leader operating with a unique set of priorities.
The discussion surrounding this report inevitably brings up the issue of accountability. How could such a plan even be considered? Who was involved, and what measures were taken to ensure secrecy? It’s a question of whether anyone in his team questioned the obvious problems with such a plan. What’s even more striking is the thought that the media might have ignored a plan like this under a different President. The implication is clear: such a scenario would have ignited a firestorm of criticism.
The idea of demolishing part of the White House to build a ballroom raises serious questions about priorities. The potential cost of the ballroom project, estimated at $300 million, further amplifies these concerns, especially when considering other pressing national issues.
Furthermore, the alleged incident provides a window into the inner workings of the former administration. It suggests a culture where historical preservation took a backseat to personal desires and political expediency. The secrecy surrounding the plan underscores a level of distrust in the public and a willingness to operate outside the norms of transparency.
The responses to the story show that many feel Trump’s behavior is consistent with his past actions. The alleged incident, if true, serves as a stark reminder of the complexities of power, the importance of historical preservation, and the need for accountability.
The audacity of the situation is almost comical. The notion that an entire historic building could simply be removed overnight without anyone noticing, is ludicrous, bordering on surreal. The report highlights the former President’s alleged mindset – one where personal ambition and disregard for tradition took precedence.
The use of the F-word in this context, as reported, isn’t just about profanity; it’s a reflection of the overall attitude, a casual dismissal of decorum and a willingness to bulldoze through established norms. This alleged incident, as described, is the epitome of the “Trump era,” characterized by shock value and a consistent disregard for the expected.