By John Q. Hosedrinker 
During a recent conversation with reporters, President Trump admitted the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, a test designed to detect early cognitive decline, was “very hard.” Despite his physician reporting a perfect score on the test in April, the president claimed later questions, like skip counting and word association, were particularly challenging. He challenged Democratic congresswomen to take the exam, seemingly implying its difficulty, while also acknowledging the test does not measure intelligence. This admission comes amid ongoing questions about his physical and mental well-being, including observed symptoms of memory lapses and physical ailments.
Read the original article here
Trump Confesses That He Found Elementary School-Level Test ‘Very Hard’
The core of this revelation is quite straightforward: Donald Trump admitted to finding an elementary school-level test “very hard.” This isn’t just about a difficult quiz; it’s about the standard operating procedure for a particular brand of narcissism. The impulse to inflate achievements, even when those achievements are demonstrably modest, is a recurring theme. The context is that he likely took a cognitive test, perhaps designed to screen for age-related cognitive decline, and then framed it as some kind of remarkable feat. This is what you see in the common phrase “release the Epstein records,” reflecting the cynicism surrounding the situation.
Trump’s tendency to frame things in this way is deeply ingrained, and it often leads to what seem like self-inflicted wounds. He seems unable to resist the urge to exaggerate, even at the cost of appearing less competent. The interesting contrast to this is his repeated mention of individuals like AOC and Jasmine Crockett, both of whom have impressive academic backgrounds. This further highlights the gap between his self-perception and reality.
It’s important to recognize that this wasn’t necessarily a test of raw intelligence in the traditional sense. These cognitive assessments frequently involve tasks like identifying common objects, understanding simple instructions, and basic memory recall. The fact that he struggled with these kinds of exercises is what really sticks in your mind. The image of the test itself is telling – often incorporating simple visual cues and questions that most children master at a young age. His admission of difficulty, then, suggests that he found the dementia test to be overly challenging.
The fact that Trump has repeated this pattern of behavior numerous times adds to the sense of the absurd. He brags about acing tests designed to assess cognitive function, despite the clear implications of his struggles. There’s a certain irony in how easily his supporters appear to overlook these incidents, effectively allowing him to continue the cycle. There seems to be an assumption that the test results, and any accompanying video, should be made public.
Consider what an elementary level test would actually encompass. It might involve basic arithmetic, identifying simple science concepts, or knowing key historical facts. The average adult in America might struggle with the test, and in many respects, that is the crux of the problem. Many sources highlight that a toddler can typically identify common animals, while children generally learn to read an analog clock around the age of six or seven. Trump’s claims of triumph on such a test are clearly at odds with his demonstrated cognitive limitations. His statements, then, seem more like a joke than a genuine reflection of reality.
The discussion also raises an interesting hypothetical scenario. It’s suggested that a challenge be issued, with AOC and Crockett facing off against Trump in a public test of intelligence. The stakes could be high, involving consequences that range from the relinquishing of political office to even potential legal ramifications. It’s a provocative thought experiment, highlighting the public’s desire for transparency and accountability.
It’s common knowledge that Trump’s academic record has been a subject of scrutiny, with allegations of others taking his exams and accounts of poor performance at the university level. This context only reinforces the narrative that his struggles with the cognitive test were a symptom of a larger pattern. The ability to manipulate and deceive seems to be Trump’s true forte.
This situation can be seen as an illustration of how certain individuals can leverage their weaknesses to their advantage. They may not possess innate cognitive abilities, but their determination, their ability to navigate loopholes, and their ruthless pursuit of self-interest allow them to achieve a measure of “success.” The test he took isn’t really intended to determine IQ; it’s meant to look for signs of cognitive impairment related to old age. This then leads back to the point that he might have taken this test as part of a routine physical, possibly including an MRI. This prompts further questions about his overall health.
His responses in the testing also provide context on his behavior. The story of a dementia patient who said, “Doctor, these pictures are very naughty, but I like them,” also highlights the potential for inappropriate behavior during cognitive testing. This makes it more understandable as to why these cognitive tests are required. The suggestion that Trump may be exhibiting signs of cognitive decline is difficult to ignore.
The nature of the test itself – the repeating of words, the recall of numbers – helps explain the challenges. It’s not necessarily a reflection of high-level intellect but rather of memory, focus, and basic cognitive function. The idea that someone like AOC or Crockett should take the same test feels counterintuitive. Their youth and intelligence are well-established, making them clearly unsuitable as a direct comparison.
The overall narrative emphasizes the inherent limitations of Trump’s cognitive abilities, and the implications these limitations have. The fact that we have voted for him previously is a recurring question. His overnight “truths” and tweets also show an obvious pattern. His pattern of behavior seems to emphasize an overall impairment.
The final point is an obvious one: It is completely unsurprising that Trump may have struggled with what was presented as an elementary level test, given his reported history. It is a commentary on his public persona and his political style. It highlights the tendency for him to find a way to make any situation appear to be his personal accomplishment.