By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The government shutdown has placed SNAP benefits for millions of Americans in jeopardy. The U.S. Department of Agriculture claims it cannot pay November’s benefits without congressional action. Democrats and anti-hunger groups, however, contend that the USDA has both the funding and authority to provide the benefits, accusing the administration of choosing to withhold aid. House Republicans place blame on Democrats for blocking funding. This dispute could have severe consequences for over 22 million households and become a major point of contention in the ongoing funding stalemate.
Read the original article here
The Trump Administration Buried Legal Memo Suggesting It Could Pay November Food Benefits
So, here’s the deal: there’s this whole situation swirling around the Trump administration and their handling of SNAP benefits, you know, the food assistance program. It looks like there was a legal memo floating around that quietly suggested the administration *could* actually pay for those November food benefits, but for some reason, that memo never saw the light of day. And we all know, people are going to be hurting come November, with both food assistance and healthcare in the crosshairs.
What’s really frustrating is seeing this happen while other funds seem to be flowing freely. We’re talking about billions for projects like the Argentina deal, but when it comes to feeding Americans, suddenly the well has run dry. It’s like the administration is picking and choosing which things are important, and it definitely feels like they’re putting political games above the well-being of the people they’re supposed to be serving.
This isn’t just about money; it’s about priorities. They’re claiming no money for food benefits but we know they can afford other things, they are making people choose between basic necessities and the government is essentially saying “let them eat cake.” It’s hard not to see this as a deliberate strategy. Some speculate the administration is playing hardball, creating a sense of crisis to later swoop in and “save the day.” Of course, they could pay. They paid Argentina $40 billion to buy an election. They don’t *want* to pay.
The lack of transparency is also a huge issue. There was a legal memo, but it was apparently kept hidden from the public eye. And with the administration’s claims about funds being “unavailable,” one can’t help but wonder what other options were considered.
Then there’s the timing of all this. It’s happening right before Thanksgiving, which feels designed to inflame tensions. Making people feel desperate and hungry just before a holiday is a pretty powerful message. We see this with people saying MAGA knows this, that starving people are desperate people.
It feels like they are using this situation to push their own agenda. Some speculate, there’s even talk about potentially trying to use civil unrest to justify invoking the insurrection act. It’s a lot to process, and it really raises the question of what’s truly driving these decisions.
Let’s be clear: this isn’t just about a budget; this is about choices. The administration had options. They seemingly chose not to utilize those options. And now, regular Americans are facing real hardship because of it. There’s no shortage of money if they can find $40 billion in the couch cushions to give to Argentina. These were all lies. The people in power are not lifting a finger to help the people they serve.
In the midst of all this, it’s easy to see how this situation could backfire. History has shown that just because Trump **can** pay, doesn’t mean he **will**. They are playing politics with American’s lives. It could very well strengthen the resolve of people who are already struggling. And it would be hilarious if Canada were to make a big splashy public announcement that they want to send food aid into the US to help ease the suffering since the government is unable to help its citizens.
Ultimately, this whole situation underscores a disturbing truth: the well-being of many Americans seems to be secondary to political maneuvering. And that’s something we should all be concerned about.