By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A Tennessee sheriff is defending the arrest of a man who posted a meme referencing a school shooting, despite the meme not containing any direct threats. The arrest, based on potential misinterpretations of the meme’s reference to “Perry High School,” has sparked free speech concerns. The sheriff claims the arrest was necessary due to community fear, and the man refused to delete the post, though the officer acknowledged that it was not illegal. The man faces felony charges and a high bond, while free speech advocates and others question the legitimacy of the arrest, particularly since the sheriff admitted the meme was not directly threatening.
Read the original article here
Tennessee sheriff defends jailing liberal activist for posting Trump meme about school shooting. It seems this situation has everyone talking, and honestly, the whole thing sounds like something out of a bad movie. We’re talking about a sheriff in Tennessee who decided to lock up a guy, let’s call him the “keyboard warrior,” for posting a meme. The meme in question? Well, it involved a quote from Donald Trump about school shootings. The sheriff’s reasoning? Well, apparently, he thought the post was a threat.
The sheriff’s defense of this action is a bit mind-boggling, isn’t it? It suggests that the act of posting something online, even if it’s considered provocative or offensive by some, is now enough to warrant an arrest. It’s hard to overlook the irony – the very people who often cry foul about censorship and the erosion of free speech seem to be the ones most eager to silence their critics. It’s almost as if some people selectively apply the principles of the Constitution.
The fact that the sheriff appears to be taking this so seriously, even going as far as to suggest that deleting the post would have made everything okay, is pretty telling. It raises questions about the sheriff’s understanding of the law and, frankly, his judgment. The implications of this are troubling. It’s a slippery slope. Are we now to be policed for our opinions, especially if those opinions are critical of powerful figures? And if deleting a post is enough to make a potential threat disappear, what does that say about the seriousness of the charges to begin with?
It makes you wonder, are keyboard warriors really that infamous in Tennessee? It sounds like some people are actively monitoring social media, keeping tabs on who posts what, and keeping lists of posts they don’t like. It seems we have another case of “America! Home of the Karens! Land of the wanna-be Gestapo!” The sheer audacity of arresting someone for agreeing with the federal government’s stance is astounding, and it’s even more infuriating when you consider the possible financial repercussions for the county.
The sheriff’s apparent justification that threats are okay if the posts are simply deleted is disturbing. That’s not how law enforcement is supposed to function, and it’s certainly not how it should function in a country that values free speech. The fact this guy is sitting in jail on a $2 million bail is absurd. The whole thing just reeked of an abuse of power. I doubt anyone honestly believed this was a threat, or that anyone pulled their kids from school over a meme.
It’s hard to avoid the feeling that this is just another example of “trickle-down fascism” at play. The sheriff seems to be exactly the kind of person you’d expect in this situation, a lying, right-wing authoritarian drunk on power. It’s a sad state of affairs when a public official seems more interested in posturing for a specific audience than upholding the law fairly. This is the kind of situation that can bankrupt a county, and frankly, it’s not a good look.
The comments suggest this will end up in a lawsuit. I hope the activist wins big and the county pays dearly for this behavior. This is not about being “manly” or tough. It’s about abuse of power. As the comments point out, it’s a reminder of a system that can be weaponized. We are talking about a guy who has been sitting in jail for a month with a motion to reduce the bail not set to be heard for several weeks. This is a very real situation, and a person’s life can be ruined by this kind of abuse.
The general sentiment seems to be that this is an overreach of authority and that the sheriff’s actions are simply unacceptable. The conversation turns to discussing other options for the keyboard warrior’s activism, as the comments mention “posting about Trump being a: Pedophile, Rapist, Convicted felon, Con artist, Failure as a business man and human being, Morbidly obese ugly little orange shit stain”. It brings up a very important aspect of the discussion – free speech.
The situation has everyone talking about freedom of speech, with the added irony of the situation. It points out how the conservatives will always complain when they are the ones who are being affected. The conversation moves into the topic of constitutional rights, with a suggestion of a “constitution 2.0” to represent everybody in this country. It is clear that people find this to be a serious abuse of power. The comments are full of frustration and the hope that this will be corrected in civil court.