By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Dr. David S. Glosser, Stephen Miller’s uncle, has publicly criticized his nephew, including agreeing with a commenter who called Miller a “depraved fiend.” Glosser has previously accused Miller of white nationalism and using propaganda tactics. His posts, which condemn both Miller and President Trump, resurfaced after Miller’s cousin, Alisa Kasmer, posted a viral message severing ties with the White House aide and calling him “the face of evil.” Kasmer, who had once loved her cousin, detailed how her family has suffered under Miller’s influence. Glosser characterized Miller as an “immigration hypocrite” because of his opposition to accepting refugees, given his own family’s history.
Read the original article here
Stephen Miller’s uncle agrees that he’s a “depraved fiend,” and frankly, it’s a sentiment that’s hard to ignore, especially when considering the context. This isn’t just a casual disagreement; it’s a condemnation from within the family, a deep-seated disgust from a relative who knows him intimately. The uncle, Dr. David S. Glosser, a retired neuropsychologist, clearly doesn’t mince words. Calling your nephew “odious” is a pretty harsh indictment, but describing him as the “purest example” of hypocrisy within the Trump administration really drives the point home.
Glosser’s criticism doesn’t appear to be a recent development. He’s been vocal about his disapproval for years, accusing Miller of harboring a “commitment to white nationalism” and employing tactics reminiscent of Nazi propaganda. This isn’t some snap judgment; it’s an ongoing assessment, a consistent evaluation of Miller’s actions and their implications. And it seems the events of recent years haven’t softened his opinion. The fact that his comments have resurfaced after so much time underscores the depth of his feelings and the continued relevance of his concerns.
The “hypocrisy” Glosser references is a key point here. It’s about how Miller, as the descendant of Eastern European Jews who fled violence, advocates for policies that deny refuge to others. This disconnect, this apparent disregard for his own family’s history, is what seems to be at the heart of Glosser’s outrage. It’s not just about policy disagreements; it’s about a betrayal of fundamental values, a rejection of the very principles that his ancestors fought to uphold.
Adding to the picture is Miller’s cousin, Alisa Kasmer. Her post is also quite moving, especially when she recalls growing up with Miller and hearing stories about their ancestors surviving the Holocaust. She writes about the family’s commitment to “never again” and how Miller’s actions seem to contradict this promise. Her words, filled with a deep sense of loss and disappointment, are quite powerful. These aren’t just political disagreements; they’re a familial rupture.
The consistent thread through all these critical comments is the perception of cruelty. Kasmer describes Miller as “the face of evil,” and Glosser explicitly states that “cruelty is and has always been the point.” These are strong accusations, painting a picture of a man who appears to take pleasure in the suffering of others. It’s a very dark picture, and one that should give us all pause.
The reaction to these comments seems to be a mix of horror and understanding. There is some commentary on the shock of a family disowning one of their own, and on the depth of hatred one must inspire to have family members make such statements. It’s hard to imagine the level of disappointment and anger that must drive someone to such public condemnation.
Of course, the lack of response from both Glosser and the White House to requests for comment speaks volumes. Silence, in this case, is almost as damning as the accusations themselves. It allows the criticisms to stand unchallenged and reinforces the perception that Miller’s actions speak louder than any denials.
Looking at the larger picture, this episode raises important questions about the nature of power, ideology, and personal responsibility. How does someone, particularly one who has experienced family struggles, find themselves so far removed from their roots and family? The reactions to this news suggest it highlights one of the most unsettling aspects of the Trump era.
In the end, Stephen Miller’s uncle’s condemnation, coupled with the words of his cousin, paints a picture of a man whose actions have alienated him from his family. And the reason, it seems, is that this family deeply values the principles that Miller seems to have abandoned. It is, at its core, a story of betrayal, and it is one of the saddest of the many sad stories from recent times.