By John Q. Hosedrinker 
During a recent CNN interview, White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller appeared to suggest President Trump possesses “plenary authority,” which implies the president’s power is essentially limitless. This comment, made while discussing the deployment of federal troops to cities, caused Miller to abruptly pause, and the interview was subsequently edited to remove the phrase. Legal experts note that “plenary authority” isn’t explicitly granted to the president under the US Code, and Judge Immergut previously ruled the president’s justifications for deploying troops were baseless. Some analysts suggest Miller’s statements reveal the administration’s view that Trump can unilaterally decide when to invoke emergency powers, and that this is an intentional strategy to polarize the public and consolidate power.
Read the original article here
Stephen Miller Says ‘Quiet Part Out Loud,’ Claims Trump Has Unlimited ‘Plenary Authority’ Before Going Silent in Interview
The whole thing feels like a slip, doesn’t it? Stephen Miller, during an interview, letting the words “plenary authority” roll off his tongue, which feels like it was not supposed to happen just yet. It’s a phrase most people don’t casually toss around. And then, poof, the interview gets re-edited, the specific phrasing scrubbed from the final version. It’s hard not to think, “Oops, maybe he wasn’t supposed to say that.” It feels like they’re moving towards something more along the lines of what happened in Germany in the 1930s. It is hard to ignore the obvious.
The level of hypocrisy is astounding, isn’t it? Here’s Trump, constantly criticizing his political rivals for their age, yet Miller and the Project 2025 folks are practically running the show, guiding Trump towards their own goals. It really does seem like they are committing something along the lines of treason, right in the open, and yet…
It feels like we’re well past the point of no return. The phrase “plenary authority” perfectly describes what MAGA and Trump want. It describes it exactly. There is a desperate feeling that there is nothing that can be done to stop them.
And, honestly, it’s a little terrifying. Hearing a guy who’s supposed to be in government spew out such potentially dangerous ideas is not a good look. This wasn’t a mistake, it was the plan. The interview felt structured, like Miller was following someone else’s directions. It was like he was told to just go silent.
This kind of language confirms what many have suspected. He is acting as a messenger, revealing the plan. The silence that followed, the attempt to backtrack, all of it, points towards something deliberate, something orchestrated. They’re trying to normalize the idea, to get people used to the concept of absolute power.
It is very telling. The law is a tool, and they know it. It’s a means to an end, and the end is control. Law is selectively enforced to oppress whoever is seen as a threat, which is a dangerous path.
This whole thing is just a reminder of how easily things can be taken away if the people in power can twist the law. It is a hard truth, and one we seem to be paying the price for.
Frankly, at this point, it feels as though very little of what’s happening in politics is surprising anymore. It is lies and projection. The cases, if any, are lost.
The core of the matter is that the media is soft. There is very little challenge to the lies and disinformation. This has provided a platform for the spread of unchecked propaganda. The situation is now a full sprint towards authoritarianism.
The fact that he said it feels like a test. It’s a tactic to see how people react. His casual manner really shows a lack of regard for anything outside of his own ambitions.
It’s Trump by default, which is vile. He has already used the same line. It is clear. Trump wants to claim plenary authority.
And here’s the part that really highlights how troubling this all is: the media’s complicity. CNN’s editing, the scrub of the phrase, the clear attempt to control the narrative – it’s all part of the problem. It raises serious questions about transparency. Something this brazen does not get a pass.
And let’s be honest, he knows he screwed up. If he backtracks, his authority will be called into question and his strategy will crumble. The only thing to do is to shut up. It is a chilling illustration of how carefully constructed this all is. It feels like someone was just chewing him out over his earpiece.