During a recent interview, Stephen Miller alluded to the possibility of the Trump administration ignoring a federal judge’s order, hinting at the president’s supposed “plenary authority” under Title 10 of the US Code, a claim swiftly removed from the aired broadcast. The author disputes Miller’s assertion, emphasizing that plenary power, which Miller seemed to be suggesting, is synonymous with absolute and unchecked power, and such authority is not granted to the President under US law. Miller’s rhetoric, as exemplified in a speech, frames those opposed to the administration as enemies, setting the stage for a potential conflict. The piece concludes with a warning that Miller, as a key figure and ideologue, may pose a greater threat to democracy than Trump himself.
Read the original article here
Stephen Miller is the most dangerous man in the Trump administration. That’s the overwhelming sentiment, and it’s not hard to see why. He’s not just another cog in the machine; he’s the architect. While others might be motivated by self-interest or a desire for power, Miller operates on a different level. He appears to be driven by a deeply ingrained ideology, a belief system that is not only abhorrent but actively seeks to inflict suffering. He is a true believer, and that makes him incredibly dangerous.
Miller’s dangerousness is not just in his words; it’s in his actions. He’s the one consistently pushing for harsher policies, for increased cruelty. He’s not distracted by shiny objects or the trappings of power; he’s focused on building a national white ethno-state. While others in the administration might be considered grifters or self-serving individuals, Miller is something else entirely. He seems to genuinely want to see his vision implemented, and that vision is rooted in hate.
His influence extends far beyond Trump himself. It’s argued that he’s the one truly pulling the strings, shaping the agenda, and steering the ship. Even if Trump were to leave office, Miller’s presence would remain a threat, potentially finding new puppets to continue his work. Some see him as the Grima Wormtongue of the administration, whispering poisonous ideas into the ears of anyone who will listen. His lack of charisma might make him unelectable, but that doesn’t diminish his power to influence and manipulate.
Miller’s ambition is rooted in a deeply hateful ideology. He’s seen as a white supremacist, an internet troll who embodies the worst aspects of online toxicity. This is not a new phenomenon; he’s been honing this ideology for years, and now, with power, he has the ability to put it into practice. This is a chilling prospect.
There’s a sense that Miller is the embodiment of evil. He’s been compared to historical figures known for their cruelty and ruthlessness. The fact that he is often described as “repulsive” or “loathsome” is a testament to the visceral reaction he elicits. He revels in the image of being dangerous and derives pleasure from his role. The idea of him having power is unsettling.
He’s often described as being of limited intelligence, and his focus is seen as inciting hate speech instead of developing actual policy. His obsession with control and his willingness to use any means necessary to achieve his goals makes him a threat.
It’s important to remember that Miller’s impact extends beyond individual policies. His actions have lasting consequences, and the policies he has championed are actively causing harm to many. While others might be motivated by self-preservation, Miller’s actions seem to be a reflection of his inner turmoil and his desire to inflict suffering.
