By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Republican Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson, expresses concerns about the potential for dictatorship in the United States, yet the article argues that the threat is arising from within his own party and that he is enabling it. Johnson has consistently defended Donald Trump’s actions, including calls for prosecuting political opponents and sending troops into American cities, dismissing any criticism or concerns. Despite Trump’s controversial behavior and actions, Johnson has remained steadfast in his support, often downplaying or justifying his actions, and voting in alignment with the former president. This behavior by the Speaker raises questions about the integrity of the government and a dangerous surrender of power.
Read the original article here
The Speaker of the House is Abetting Authoritarianism, or perhaps even more accurately, *engaging* in it. It’s difficult to ignore the stark reality staring us in the face. The actions of the current Speaker, Mike Johnson, appear to mirror historical patterns of authoritarian tendencies. We see echoes of grievances detailed in the Declaration of Independence, specifically a resistance to laws that accommodate the needs of large segments of the population, unless those groups are willing to surrender their right to representation. This alone is deeply concerning.
The Speaker of the House is Abetting Authoritarianism when legislative bodies are convened in inconvenient locations, away from public records, presumably to wear down opposition and force compliance. This tactic is straight out of the authoritarian playbook. It’s a blatant attempt to manipulate the process and control the outcome, further solidifying the impression of a leader with little regard for democratic norms.
The Speaker of the House is Abetting Authoritarianism, and it goes beyond procedural maneuvers. There are serious questions being raised about the protection of wrongdoers, specifically the protection of those accused of heinous crimes. Whether such accusations are accurate or not, the perception of covering up serious offenses, combined with the other actions mentioned, only serves to fuel the flames of distrust and fear.
The Speaker of the House is Abetting Authoritarianism by demonstrating a clear and consistent pattern of prioritizing partisanship over the needs of the people he represents. This behavior, coupled with a perceived indifference to the well-being of his constituents, paints a picture of a leader more concerned with maintaining power than with serving the public good.
The Speaker of the House is Abetting Authoritarianism when we see evidence of participation in events like those of January 6th. This further reinforces the idea that he is an architect of this system, that he holds the reins of authority. This type of behavior isn’t simply “abetting” – it’s active participation in undermining the very foundations of a democratic republic.
The Speaker of the House is Abetting Authoritarianism by being an individual who seems to be controlled by fear, possibly even personal fears. The very fact that so many are talking about the man’s personal life and how he lives it is a tell tale sign that something is not right. The fact that his religious convictions appear to take priority over the needs of his constituents is something to be deeply troubled by.
The Speaker of the House is Abetting Authoritarianism because we are seeing a disturbing trend. The fact that the “normal ones” are not stepping up or speaking out is a problem.
The Speaker of the House is Abetting Authoritarianism, in line with the rise of Christian nationalism. The idea of placing a specific deity above all others and everyone, is an inherently authoritarian concept. It’s a direct challenge to the separation of church and state and a move towards a theocratic system.
The Speaker of the House is Abetting Authoritarianism, because his actions and behaviors align with a broader, concerning trend. It’s not just about one individual. It’s about a network of individuals, all working towards a common goal, even if it comes with a hefty cost, or personal cost.
The Speaker of the House is Abetting Authoritarianism, and the fact that the majority of Americans may have enabled this. This can be seen in the large numbers of people who voted for candidates who promised to rule as a dictator. It also can be seen in the many who did not vote, who did not pay attention, or who didn’t care.
The Speaker of the House is Abetting Authoritarianism, and we see it in his very persona. There is something in his tone, in his statements, in his public appearances, that raises red flags. It’s a mixture of dishonesty and a thirst for power.
The Speaker of the House is Abetting Authoritarianism, and, as some suggest, perhaps even more. The very fact that the man allegedly doesn’t have a bank account, and brags that he can’t masturbate unless he tells his son is highly concerning, and raises many questions about his integrity, and his motives.
The Speaker of the House is Abetting Authoritarianism, and we see an administration attempting to circumvent the Constitution. We have reason to be afraid for our country and our future.