By John Q. Hosedrinker Access to this content from Telegraph Media Group Holdings Ltd is strictly restricted. Unauthorized access is prohibited, and individuals must have prior permission and a valid contract to view the material. Interested parties should contact [email protected] to explore licensing options. Telegraph Subscribers should contact [email protected], referencing the provided code.
Read the original article here
The political battle of our age is not between Left and Right, but sane and insane. It’s a stark assessment, one that cuts through the noise of partisan bickering to reveal the fundamental struggle at the heart of our current political landscape. It’s a concept that resonates, even if the application of “sane” and “insane” feels loaded. We’ve entered an era where rational discourse seems to have been replaced by a cacophony of conspiracy theories, blatant disregard for facts, and a willingness to embrace demonstrably false narratives.
The “insane” side, as many perceive it, often seems to be winning. They’ve abandoned reason and logic, feeding on fear and hatred to solidify their base. This is not merely a matter of disagreeing on policy; it’s a fundamental break from shared reality. The problem, though, lies in the subjective nature of sanity. What one side considers “sane,” the other sees as radical or even dangerous. The truth is, this division is not new; it is a manifestation of the age-old struggle between the rich and the poor.
The so-called “insane” are adept at manipulating those who are less informed, as well as those struggling with poverty or economic anxiety. The lines are further blurred by the influence of wealth, which has always been a significant factor in politics. It’s a dynamic that has created a system where compromising for compromise’s sake can be damaging, giving ground to those who operate outside the realm of reason. The obsession with compromise, without achieving meaningful progress, plays right into the hands of those who are dedicated to a different kind of politics, one fueled by division and manufactured outrage.
The focus should be on the fundamental issues of wealth distribution and power dynamics. It’s a battle that has been waged for centuries, but is now being fought in a more distorted and increasingly volatile environment. Propaganda and misinformation are used to divide and conquer, distracting us from the core issues. The “insane,” in this context, are those who are being used to push an agenda that benefits the wealthy elite.
The real fight is a class war, between the haves and have-nots. It’s about billionaires and those they would have enslaved. The current political landscape, where the “insane” elements seem to dominate, is fueled by a coordinated effort to further their interests. These are not mere acts of stupidity, but a deliberate strategy to create an environment ripe for control. The “insane” are the useful pawns, the foot soldiers for a larger agenda.
Stupidity, as Dietrich Bonhoeffer noted, is a more dangerous enemy than malice. It is resistant to reason, impervious to facts. The stupid person is often self-satisfied and easily angered, and is thus a threat. Persuading a stupid person is impossible and dangerous. Stupidity is not just an intellectual defect but a human one. Those in power benefit from the stupidity of others, by depriving them of inner independence. It is important to understand the nature of stupidity, it has to be seen for what it is and dealt with in a way that does not engage with it.
The current political environment is a perfect illustration of Bonhoeffer’s observations. The rise of extreme ideologies and the spread of misinformation are symptoms of a deeper problem: the erosion of critical thinking and the embrace of simplistic narratives. It is an environment where complex issues are reduced to soundbites and where truth is increasingly subjective. The “sane,” must remain vigilant, and fight to maintain their hold on the truth.
The fight is ultimately between those who are driven by good faith and those operating in bad faith. It’s about those who are willing to grapple with complexity and those who cling to simplistic answers. It is a struggle that requires courage, conviction, and a commitment to truth. The goal should be to create a society where good faith is valued above all else. While the definition of “sane” will likely vary from one person to another, what should be constant is the pursuit of a world where honesty, empathy, and critical thinking reign supreme.