By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In response to the Trump administration’s pressure on Venezuela, the Russian government expressed its support for Venezuelan sovereignty and indicated a willingness to assist. The Russian Foreign Ministry stated they would respond to requests from Venezuela in light of “emerging threats.” Despite this warning, the Trump administration appears to be escalating its military campaign, considering strikes against targets linked to the Maduro regime and drug trafficking. While the administration claims the operation is popular and doesn’t require Congressional approval, some Republican lawmakers are calling for greater oversight.
Read the original article here
Russia’s statement, “We Stand Ready To Respond Appropriately” regarding potential U.S. pressure on Venezuela, is definitely stirring up some interesting thoughts. It feels like this is less a serious threat and more a carefully crafted message, perhaps aimed at boosting their image on the global stage, though the underlying reality seems quite different.
The phrase “respond appropriately” is practically a punchline, isn’t it? It appears to be Russian slang for doing absolutely nothing. Considering their struggles in Ukraine, it’s hard to imagine them projecting real power across the globe. We all remember how their logistics crumbled just a few kilometers from their own border, and their tanks ran out of fuel. That image, paired with the idea of them trying to project force into the Caribbean, is, frankly, comical.
The conflict in Ukraine has exposed Russia as a paper tiger. They can’t even secure a victory against a much smaller and arguably weaker neighbor. It makes you wonder, what exactly can they accomplish against a superpower like the United States, thousands of miles away? The military that once ranked near the top, now seems to be struggling to maintain its presence and capabilities.
They are losing to a country that they were supposed to easily overpower in a matter of days. That doesn’t exactly instill confidence in their ability to intervene effectively in Venezuela. The idea of them entering into another conflict with the U.S. feels absurd, considering their current limitations. Where would they even find the resources? Their military hardware seems to be showing its age, and the world has taken notice of their struggles.
It’s hard not to chuckle at the thought of their response. Perhaps deploying that rusted, smoke-belching aircraft carrier? Maybe sending troops on horseback? It just doesn’t seem plausible. The Ukrainian war has highlighted their weaknesses, the lack of strategic planning and modern equipment.
The entire situation seems to be riddled with ironies. The fact that they can’t protect their own capital, or even hold onto the territories they claim in Ukraine, makes their threats about Venezuela sound hollow. Their support for allies like Syria and Armenia hasn’t exactly been a resounding success. In fact, their so-called “appropriate” responses in those situations were hardly effective.
The situation in Venezuela is complex, and the potential involvement of Russia adds another layer of intrigue. An attack there could backfire in a number of ways. It could potentially break down the delicate relationship between Putin and Trump.
Of course, a disruption in Venezuelan oil could drive up prices, and that would benefit Russia’s economy. But at the end of the day, Russia would be in no position to intervene or assist Venezuela if the US decided to intervene militarily. Their military and economic power is not what it used to be.
The situation is a bit like a game of poker. Russia is bluffing, holding onto a weak hand while attempting to intimidate with bluster. However, everyone at the table can see that bluff. The world is watching. And the consensus seems to be that Russia’s “appropriate response” is unlikely to be anything more than a symbolic gesture, if that. It seems that if the U.S. decides to pressure Venezuela, Russia’s response will be little more than a whisper.