By John Q. Hosedrinker 
On the Dobropillia axis, Russian forces have suffered significant losses since the counteroffensive began, totaling approximately 3,520 personnel, including 1,988 killed. General Oleksandr Syrskyi reported that Ukrainian forces are improving strike effectiveness and disrupting Russian logistics in the area. Additionally, the situation near Yampil has been stabilized, with Ukrainian forces conducting operations to eliminate remaining enemy groups. Furthermore, 991 units of Russian weapons and military equipment have been destroyed or damaged in this area.
Read the original article here
Over 3,500 Russian soldiers lost in Dobropillia counteroffensive, Ukrainian Commander says, and this certainly paints a grim picture of the situation. The numbers are staggering, suggesting intense fighting and heavy casualties on the Russian side. One has to wonder, with such significant losses, how effective are the remaining Russian units? Are they still considered combat-ready by modern standards? It’s a question that weighs heavily on the minds of many.
If the attrition rate is indeed this severe, one can only imagine the impact on Russia’s ability to sustain its offensive. Putin’s determination to continue the war is clear, unfortunately. Ukraine is defending itself, after all, but it’s hard to see a quick resolution. The historical pattern of using a “meat grinder” approach by Russia seems to be playing out, and it’s certainly a grim reality for the Ukrainian defenders.
The reports indicate that the Ukrainian defense is proving dominant. While it’s difficult to fully trust some news sources, given potential biases, the overall trend points to serious challenges for the Russian forces. The numbers of dead and wounded are a sobering reminder of the human cost of this conflict. The thought experiment of what could have been, with more decisive support for Ukraine from the West, is a painful one, as it could have potentially reduced the war to a fraction of the time.
The war has entered its third year now, and the human cost is immense. The number of lives lost, both soldiers and civilians, is heartbreaking. One wonders how those families are coping. It highlights the sheer scale of the tragedy. The use of antiquated equipment, like horses in modern warfare, underscores the challenges faced by the Russian military. However, Russia still has a large population.
The question is, how sustainable is this approach? Russia is bringing in new soldiers, with reports of thousands joining the ranks monthly. Yet, Ukraine is also struggling to replenish its forces, and the pressure on both sides is immense. Russia still has experienced special forces units, and a significant presence of drone controllers.
Considering the number of soldiers being added, it’s possible the actual figures could be even higher. The methods for recruiting soldiers also vary. Reports indicate that Ukraine has had to resort to drastic measures to fill its ranks, a concerning sign of the war’s strain. The ongoing conflict is truly a battle of attrition, a devastating contest where the cost is always measured in human lives.
Given the circumstances, it seems the Russian leadership feels cornered, with no easy way out. They continue to pour resources into the conflict, even if some of the information is untrustworthy or potentially exaggerated. The focus is on holding the line, and the future remains uncertain. The bodies of those lost on both sides are now being processed, but this does not negate the loss.
The exchange of bodies between the warring sides reveals the devastating reality of this war. The fact that so many are being returned is a testament to the scale of the casualties. The war continues with the same pattern. The human cost is horrific.
The fact that antiquated weaponry, like Mosin rifles and Maxim machine guns, are still being used highlights the nature of the conflict. Despite the imbalance in some areas, the war is proving more difficult and more enduring than initially predicted. The key question is how long each side can endure the drain on their resources, both human and economic.
The discussion on population size and available manpower is crucial. Russia has a large population, but the usable “war population” may be less than it appears. Demographic realities, and the need to protect the populations of major cities, restrict the overall pool of available soldiers. Putin is unlikely to want to impact those groups. It is a complex equation, with no easy answers.
The focus seems to be on whether Russia can sustain its efforts, but this brings its own unique problems. If Russia fails in Ukraine it may need to provoke the West to shift the narrative away from a defeat. The leadership may be willing to accept heavy casualties and the potential for more external support. The prospect of North Korean troops is also a possible future.
The Russian goal is to continue the war. The Ukrainian goal is to survive. Moscow will use the war to its own end. In short, the war in Ukraine is a brutal reminder of the costs of conflict. This will keep going. The European powers do not do enough, even if the war in Ukraine ends today, it is going to take time for the country to rebuild. It is likely to be years. It may be decades.