Recent discussions amongst Republicans have brought up the idea of former President Donald Trump running for a third term, despite the 22nd Amendment. Steve Bannon, a former senior advisor to Trump, has stated that there are various ways to ensure Trump is on the ballot in 2028, though he did not specify what those methods are. Others, like Representative Randy Fine, have suggested repealing the 22nd Amendment altogether. Legal experts, however, believe that any attempt to circumvent the amendment is unlikely to succeed and would face significant legal challenges.

Read the original article here

Trump 2028 talk is ramping up among Republicans, and it’s hard to ignore the buzz. It seems like the idea of a third Trump run is gaining traction, at least among some corners of the Republican party. We’re seeing key figures like Steve Bannon, a familiar face from Trump’s inner circle, publicly discussing “alternatives” to make it happen. Then there’s Representative Randy Fine, who’s gone so far as to propose repealing the 22nd Amendment, the one that limits presidents to two terms.

The talk isn’t necessarily organic, though. Some suspect it’s being pushed to portray Trump as robust. But, let’s face it, the man is aging, and his health is a legitimate concern. The conversation about Trump 2028 also sparks some interesting questions, especially about the potential for similar moves from the other side. Could there be calls for Obama to run again, too?

The underlying concern with all of this is that it could be a way to “normalize” actions that are legally questionable or even unconstitutional. The familiar progression of denial, rationalization, and eventually acceptance that some Republicans follow when defending Trump is quite unsettling. The whole idea that he could run again, or attempt to stay in office by other means, is unsettling.

The potential ramifications of such actions are significant, particularly for the Republican members of Congress who might face anger from constituents if they support Trump’s potential third term. The possibility that Trump might not be alive to see 2028, however, cannot be dismissed.

There are also whispers about what Trump is actually planning. He has hinted at staying in office because of national crises, claimed the 2020 election was stolen, and even flirted with the idea of exceeding the two-term limit. There have been plenty of signs and “Trump 2028” merchandise available for a while, too. Some worry that he is experimenting with his influence, with the National Guard for instance.

And of course, let’s not forget the age factor. If he were to run in 2028, Trump would be in his early 80s. The prospect of a potentially frail and increasingly forgetful President is a significant concern for some. While his supporters might overlook these factors, the country as a whole should not.

The constitutional hurdles are significant, even insurmountable. The 22nd Amendment is pretty clear about the two-term limit. Any attempt to change this would require a constitutional amendment, which is a long and complex process. The focus on the legal obstacles might seem like a good thing. But some see a danger of getting bogged down in the technicalities, losing sight of the bigger picture. If a court were to, somehow, find a loophole, that would be a disaster.

Ultimately, it’s not just about the 22nd Amendment. It’s about respecting the Constitution, which means upholding democratic values and the rule of law. These potential violations pose a danger to the country’s very foundations.

While the talk of “Trump 2028” might be happening, it’s essential to approach it with a critical eye. Whether it’s a genuine political strategy or a distraction tactic is something we’ll continue to watch. However, the possibility of Trump running for a third term should not be taken lightly.