By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In an effort to mend strained relations, President Vladimir Putin acknowledged that Russian air defenses were responsible for the downing of an Azerbaijani jetliner in December, resulting in 38 fatalities. The Russian missiles, targeting a Ukrainian drone, exploded near the Azerbaijani plane, causing the tragic incident. Putin addressed the situation at a meeting with Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev, pledging compensation and punishment for those accountable. The event, which occurred as relations between the two countries had already soured, was one of many that resulted in tension.
Read the original article here
Putin says Russian air defenses responsible for Azerbaijani jet’s crash last year, killing 38, and it’s definitely a moment. Honestly, it feels like something the world already suspected, and some folks even outright knew. But for the Russian leader to actually acknowledge responsibility? It’s a rare instance of what some might call transparency, though let’s be honest, it’s likely driven by more complex motivations. It’s not just as simple as an apology and move on, is it?
The wording, however, is fascinating, isn’t it? Apparently, according to what’s been reported, he didn’t explicitly say the plane was shot down by the rockets directly. Instead, it’s presented as if the air defense systems launched rockets that exploded *near* the plane, with the resulting debris damaging it. It’s a subtle distinction, a carefully chosen phrase that, at least in my interpretation, attempts to avoid outright admission of direct culpability. It’s more about the fallout of the event, if you will. It’s like saying, “Well, we were firing in the area, and, well, it happened.” Not exactly a straightforward “we shot it down.” It’s all about minimizing the narrative, keeping the upper hand.
The reaction to this, as you might imagine, is varied. Some see it as long overdue, a validation of what everyone else already knew. Others view it as a strategic move, perhaps an attempt to mend fences with Azerbaijan. You see, Azerbaijan has had a cooling relationship with Russia. Relations are a bit rocky, to say the least. A move like this could be a deliberate attempt to smooth things over, especially given the current international climate. Maybe he’s trying to keep potential allies close.
The timing, too, is something that can’t be overlooked. Why now? Is it pressure from other countries, or is it internal pressure? Some sources suggest compensation may be offered, which in itself is an indicator that the situation is not all good in the East, it may be just what Azerbaijan is looking for and could open the door to collaboration. It’s all speculation, but this whole thing is a chess game, right?
The history around this is unfortunately nothing new. Similar cases are often brought up when discussing this incident, such as the MH17 flight, which was also downed by a Russian missile, it seems. It makes you wonder why commercial airlines were even flying in the vicinity of conflict zones in the first place. It seems crazy now, but this seems to be the nature of the world.
One of the more disturbing aspects is the alleged cover-up that some have speculated about. The idea that air traffic control might have deliberately steered the plane towards the Caspian Sea, is really unsettling. We’ll never know. Another chilling detail is the leaked recording. This information gives weight to the allegations. Sadly it seems as though the whole truth is hard to find, or maybe even impossible.
And then, there’s the question of why Azerbaijan continues to align itself with Russia despite these incidents. It’s the geography, isn’t it? They are neighbors, plain and simple. It’s a difficult position, but it puts things into perspective.
The whole situation shines a light on the state of Russian air defenses. The perception is that they’re simultaneously overconfident, yet incompetent. The comments on whether these air defenses are really protecting anything is, well, sad. Maybe they just make the situation worse, I don’t know, but it’s something to think about.
And of course, it’s impossible to ignore the broader context: the ongoing war in Ukraine. The air strikes on Russian refineries, and the potential for Azerbaijan to supply gasoline to Russia. The pressure on Putin is getting to him. It’s possible that this admission is a desperate attempt to maintain some semblance of regional influence and control. It is the actions of a weaker country.
Ultimately, while this admission might seem like a step forward, it’s important to remember the victims of this tragedy, and the families of those who lost their lives. It’s a stark reminder of the human cost of international conflicts and the importance of accountability. And now, we’re left to see where this leads next, what the next move is, and how this will affect the already tense relations in that part of the world.