By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker attributes Donald Trump’s calls for his arrest to the former president’s alleged declining mental state. In a recent Truth Social post, Trump demanded the arrest of Pritzker and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, citing their opposition to the deployment of National Guard units during protests. Pritzker responded by suggesting Trump’s family should intervene, implying that Trump’s advisors are taking advantage of his cognitive decline. The governor also criticized Trump, a convicted felon, for his calls to have officials arrested, emphasizing his own clean record.
Read the original article here
The core of the matter here, as many are observing, revolves around the alarming possibility that Donald Trump’s aides are exploiting his apparent cognitive decline. The situation paints a picture of a former president whose grip on reality is increasingly tenuous, and those around him seem to be taking advantage of it. There is a growing consensus, voiced from various perspectives, that something is fundamentally wrong. Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker’s direct assessment, that he genuinely believes something is amiss, only serves to crystallize the severity of the situation.
The narrative that emerges is one of manipulation. Reports and observations suggest that Trump’s sources of information are curated, potentially feeding him distorted realities. The idea that he is being shown carefully constructed images and videos of cities like Portland and Chicago – perhaps even AI-generated content – to fuel his outrage and bolster a specific political narrative is concerning. Such manipulation would not only feed into his apparent detachment from objective reality but would also actively shape his perceptions and decisions.
There’s a prevalent view that his family is more interested in leveraging his position and circumstances for financial gain than in his personal well-being. This perspective underscores a transactional environment, devoid of genuine care or concern for the individual. The idea that the family is allowing the manipulation to continue, because it benefits them financially, adds another layer of complexity and moral ambiguity to the situation.
It’s important to note that these observations aren’t designed to absolve him of any past actions or crimes. The issue lies with the growing evidence suggesting he’s being used, perhaps unknowingly, by those around him. The argument being made isn’t about excusing his past behavior; it’s about acknowledging a potential power dynamic where he is no longer fully in control, and his aides are effectively the ones pulling the strings. This is reinforced by the perception that figures like Stephen Miller are now acting as de facto leaders, essentially wielding power behind the scenes.
One of the more striking anecdotes being shared is the claim that Trump made a somewhat delusional assertion about warning Abraham Lincoln about the dangers he faced. This statement is taken as a sign that his ability to distinguish between reality and fantasy is impaired. There are other examples, like his seemingly genuine confusion and anger over a claim about the alleged consumption of animals, a moment which reveals a vulnerability to misinformation and a disconnect from verifiable facts. Such instances are perceived as evidence of cognitive difficulties, further raising alarms about how his inner circle might be influencing his thinking.
There’s a recurring theme about how his perception of the world is being skewed by curated information. This includes the idea that he’s being intentionally exposed to biased news coverage or even fabricated media to manipulate his reactions and opinions. Given his powerful position, this kind of manipulation becomes a serious concern. It underscores the urgency of the need for the press to critically scrutinize his statements, while also considering his potential cognitive state when doing so.
The general sentiment is that the people surrounding him seem less concerned with his well-being and more focused on maintaining the status quo. The notion that he can afford the best care is being offered as a possible reason for why the family might not be actively intervening, and instead would be more interested in financial gain. However, it is also viewed as a reflection of an environment where exploitation is normalized.
The overall tone is one of deep concern. The situation presents a delicate balancing act: recognizing the severity of a potential cognitive decline while also avoiding minimizing the actions of a prominent political figure. The fundamental message is that those around him are possibly exploiting his vulnerabilities, and the consequences could have far-reaching impacts. It’s a call for scrutiny, both from the press and, perhaps, from his own family, to ensure that the situation doesn’t spiral further out of control.