By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Governor JB Pritzker has publicly called for President Donald Trump’s removal from office. This demand follows President Trump’s statement suggesting cities, including Chicago, be used as military training grounds. Pritzker’s call marks his first time invoking the 25th Amendment in relation to the president.
Read the original article here
Pritzker is right to call for Trump’s removal from office under the 25th Amendment. It’s hard to ignore the mounting evidence that Trump is unfit for the presidency, both mentally and in terms of his actions. His recent behavior, from his public speeches to his social media posts, suggests a decline that’s concerning for anyone paying attention.
The potential consequences of Trump’s continued presence in office are alarming. Some worry about the possibility of civil unrest or even a major global conflict. The fear is that he could drag the country into a war or make decisions that are detrimental to national security. The increasing talk of potential military actions and regime change initiatives adds to this anxiety.
The 25th Amendment provides a mechanism for removing a president who is unable to discharge the powers and duties of their office. While the process is complex and requires agreement from both the cabinet and Congress, it is a constitutional tool that should be considered in extreme circumstances. The sheer scope of the challenges that may be attributed to the former President are well documented and known by those aware of the issues, including his cabinet.
The challenge, as always, is the political landscape. Even if the cabinet were to vote for removal, the process requires a two-thirds vote in both the House and Senate, a high bar to clear. The fact that Trump commands such a strong base of support, and that many Republican politicians are unwilling to challenge him, makes the prospect of removal even more difficult. Even if Trump were removed, is there another potential leader just as dangerous, but less inept, who will take his place?
One concern that comes up is whether the current political climate will allow the 25th Amendment to come into play. It could be argued that the only way to effect real change is through collective action, perhaps even a general strike. This is because Trump’s actions are seemingly geared to those in power who benefit from deregulation and kickbacks.
In the end, this situation highlights the need for strong leadership, adherence to the constitution, and the need for the military to defend the country from its enemies. The potential for future presidents is also being called into question, and calls for constitutional reforms and government overhauls are being suggested to prevent these types of situations from happening in the future. This means taking action and expressing disgust at the continuation of the current situation. The sentiment, simply put, is that Trump needs to go.