By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Illinois Governor JB Pritzker has recently called for the 25th Amendment to be invoked to remove President Trump from office following the President’s statements about using the military in American cities. Pritzker criticized Trump’s remarks, suggesting they indicate cognitive decline and are reminiscent of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s tactics. This sentiment was echoed by other Trump critics like Representative Eric Swalwell and a defense official. This call for the 25th Amendment follows concerns about Trump’s mental state, fueled by his behavior and actions, including promoting misinformation and appearing to misunderstand events. The 25th Amendment allows for the removal of a president deemed unable to fulfill their duties.
Read the original article here
Pritzker Praised for Call to Oust Trump Via 25th Amendment After Threatening US Cities. The idea of invoking the 25th Amendment to remove Donald Trump from office, a proposal that has gained traction once again, is seen by many as a necessary step given the severity of the situation. It’s a sentiment that resonates with those who feel the former President has crossed numerous lines and poses a significant threat to the nation. The fact that such discussions are even necessary highlights the gravity of the current political climate. Some feel that the bar for acceptable behavior has been drastically lowered, with the actions and rhetoric of certain figures leaving many feeling disillusioned and concerned for the future.
The call to use the 25th Amendment is viewed by many as a response to Trump’s actions, and his fitness to serve in office. The use of the 25th is seen by some as more of a political maneuver rather than a viable legal strategy. However, the mere discussion of such measures underscores the depth of the discontent and the urgency felt by those who believe the situation demands decisive action. The idea of removing someone from office for their behavior, rather than their medical ability to perform their job, is a new idea that some are struggling with.
The concept of addressing the alleged violations of the Oath of Office and Constitutional rights is a common theme in discussions surrounding Trump, and the conversation has gone on for too long. The focus then shifts to how long this can continue, and how far it can go, with a sense of concern over the potential trajectory. The mention of treason and the call for accountability are strong indicators of the feelings many hold towards the former President. Some feel that invoking the 25th is weaker than impeachment, and is unlikely to occur.
The emphasis on the difficulty of implementing the 25th Amendment, especially given the loyalty of Trump’s allies and the potential repercussions for those who might support such a move, is a reality that is understood by many. The challenges are not lost on those discussing the possibility of such action. Some people believe that the 25th isn’t useful against a president who is still walking and talking, while others are concerned that those in power, and the American people, have become complicit through their apathy.
The conversation then touches upon the broader context, discussing how the situation has evolved over time and the historical factors that contributed to the current state of affairs. The impact of societal shifts and the role of rhetoric in shaping public opinion are also recognized. The discussions also include a sense of foreboding, acknowledging the potential for further challenges and the need for preparation in anticipation of potential future difficulties.
There is a deep-seated frustration with the current political climate. There are concerns about the lack of mechanisms to address the situation, and the perceived failures of the existing systems to hold certain figures accountable. The discussion goes back and forth about the utility of the 25th, and the general consensus is that it would be better to go the route of impeachment, but the chances of doing so appear slim.
Despite the challenges, many are applauding the willingness to bring up the topic. Many people are calling for the Trump files to be released, and hope to see Trump held accountable for his actions. Some are hopeful that raising awareness of the problem will encourage people to join in.
The sentiment of people trying to find a solution and to address Trump’s actions is clear. The idea of seeking to remove someone from office for their fitness or their behavior, rather than their health, is a new idea that some are struggling with. Some feel that the 25th isn’t useful against a president who is still walking and talking, while others are concerned that those in power, and the American people, have become complicit through their apathy.