By John Q. Hosedrinker 
According to recently published notes from Mike Pence’s day planner, Donald Trump berated Pence, calling him a “wimp” for refusing to overturn the 2020 election results. The notes, included in Jonathan Karl’s new book, detail the phone call between Trump and Pence on January 6, 2021, where Trump expressed his disapproval of Pence’s decision to certify the election. The notes also reveal Trump’s apparent anger, with an emoji drawn next to a comment. The special counsel Jack Smith planned to use the notes as evidence, but the case was dismissed.
Read the original article here
Pence’s Shocking Notes on Trump Jan. 6 Phone Call Revealed, and the details emerging from a new book about that day, are truly jarring, aren’t they? It’s almost unbelievable that this information is coming out now, long after the events, and primarily through a book deal. The fact that this narrative isn’t part of a criminal investigation or public proceedings is a glaring indictment of the situation we find ourselves in.
The revelation of Trump’s brazen attempt to coerce his Vice President into overturning the 2020 election results is nothing short of a direct attack on the foundations of American democracy. This wasn’t some subtle disagreement; it was an open push to subvert the will of the people, and Pence’s notes, as detailed in the book, give us a firsthand look at the chilling details. It’s difficult to avoid the feeling that these events are unfolding in a way that prioritizes financial gain over truth and accountability.
It’s also hard not to be struck by the irony of the situation. Here we have a man, Pence, whose life was threatened by a mob fueled by the very rhetoric he was being pressured to endorse, now releasing these details through a book. It’s hard to imagine the pressure he was under, and the impossible choices he faced. The image of the Vice President’s family being targeted while calls for his death were echoing through the crowd is a stark representation of the stakes. The fact that the release of this information has been so delayed is frustrating.
The timeline really makes you think, doesn’t it? The delay in making these details public, it seems, raises uncomfortable questions about motivations and priorities. We’re left to wonder why this wasn’t brought to light when it could have directly impacted the potential for justice. Now, it’s information to be digested, but not necessarily acted upon.
The political dynamics at play here are just as frustrating. The fact that the Republican Party, and its leadership, has seemingly closed ranks behind Trump after such a blatant attempt to destroy democracy is disheartening. This creates a sense of helplessness, and highlights the deep divisions that the events of January 6th revealed. Seeing how quickly many prominent Republicans seemed to fall back in line after the initial shock is a stark reminder of the power of party loyalty, and the political survival instincts that seem to be at play.
It’s easy to get lost in the “what ifs,” isn’t it? What if Pence had spoken out earlier, more directly? Would it have changed anything? These are questions that will probably linger in our collective consciousness for a long time to come. The thought of what might have been, had different choices been made, is a tough pill to swallow.
The book’s existence raises concerns about the state of our political and justice systems. That such a crucial piece of information is released through a book, instead of a trial, adds fuel to the idea that the country is losing its way and that the institutions designed to protect the truth are failing. And the question remains: if a sitting Vice President’s life was threatened because he wouldn’t endorse the false claims of an outgoing president, how much are they really in control?
The broader context of these revelations is impossible to ignore. It’s a reminder of the fragility of democracy and the importance of safeguarding its principles. The fact that so many people supported Trump even after the events of January 6th, and continue to do so, is something that’s difficult to understand. It creates the impression that there are factions within the electorate who seem willing to disregard democratic norms for their own benefit.
And finally, the fact that this story is unfolding as an upcoming election looms adds another layer of complexity. This story of how the former Vice President was pressured to overturn the election results, a topic that’s been debated and rehashed for years, adds even more fuel to the fire. It also highlights the lack of transparency in our political system. Will this information change anything? Maybe not. But it certainly deserves to be a topic of discussion.