By Matt Underwood Outrage grows over Trump’s ‘disgusting’ AI response to ‘No Kings,’ and the sentiment is loud and clear: this is unacceptable. The former president, already a figure of immense controversy, has seemingly crossed a new line. The use of AI to depict himself in a position of power, literally shitting on the very citizens exercising their constitutional rights, is seen as deeply offensive. The sheer audacity of the act, its juvenile and crude nature, is fueling a surge of disgust and condemnation. It’s not just a political jab; it’s a deliberate act of disrespect, perceived by many as a clear indication of how he views his constituents.
The responses are varied, but a common thread weaves through the reaction: a sense of disbelief and a weary acknowledgement that this type of behavior is, sadly, not surprising. Many are not shocked by the video itself, but rather by the lack of any significant condemnation from within his own party. Where are the voices of dissent, the ones willing to stand up and denounce this blatant disregard for the dignity of the American people? The silence is deafening, adding fuel to the fire of those already incensed. It underscores a feeling that the GOP is complicit, or worse, that they find the spectacle amusing.
The narrative shifts from “outrage” to a deeper cynicism. Is it simply a case of “Trump being Trump,” or does this represent something more sinister? Some view this AI-generated response as a calculated tactic, a deliberate attempt to enrage his opponents and distract from more critical issues. It is a tool designed to provoke, to keep the spotlight on himself and, for his supporters, to further cement his image as an outsider, a fighter unafraid to offend the “woke” elite.
The commentary also reflects on the role of the media in all of this. Why is there a need to put the word “disgusting” in quotation marks? There is a palpable sense of frustration with the media’s coverage, a feeling that it’s failing to adequately portray the gravity of the situation. Some believe that the media is reluctant to criticize Trump, fearing the loss of viewership or a backlash from his devoted followers. This silence, or downplaying of the incident, only serves to amplify the outrage felt by those who are offended. The issue is more than just about a single event.
There is a sense of despair intertwined with the disgust. The AI video itself, when combined with the lack of response from the GOP, feels like the final straw for many. They see it as a symbol of the erosion of decency, of the normalization of vulgarity, and the disregard for democratic norms. The concern is not just about the former president, but also about the direction in which the country is heading.
The focus then drifts to what might be done. Protests have occurred. There’s mention of possible courses of action, such as a general strike, in an effort to truly hit the powers that be in the pocketbook. People feel they are living in an era that may be comparable to the days of Marie Antoinette. The call for a general strike is a measure of the desperation felt by many. This speaks to a deeper frustration with the limitations of traditional political discourse, and a desire to find more impactful ways to make their voices heard.
Ultimately, the consensus boils down to exhaustion, with many stating that they are no longer surprised by Trump’s actions. The AI response, the ensuing outcry, and the lack of strong condemnation from the right wing have all come together to signal a sad state of affairs. While the initial reaction is disgust, the overall feeling is one of weariness. This is not just about a single AI video; it’s about the erosion of norms, the normalization of the absurd, and the struggle to find meaning and purpose in a world where anything seems possible.