By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Norway anticipates fallout from Friday’s Nobel Peace Prize announcement amid pressure from the Trump administration to award the prize to the US president. Trump’s efforts to influence the decision, including public claims and direct appeals to Norwegian officials, have escalated, particularly with recent developments in the Middle East. However, the Norwegian Nobel Committee has indicated it will not yield to external influence. The announcement’s aftermath is highly anticipated, as Norway prepares for potential reactions to the chosen laureate.
Read the original article here
Norway on edge over Trump Ahead of Nobel Peace Prize Verdict | There are growing indications that pressure from Trump and his supporters on the Nobel committee has been, if anything, counterproductive
The anticipation surrounding the Nobel Peace Prize is always palpable, but this year, Norway is on edge, and the shadow of Donald Trump looms large. The very idea of him receiving the prestigious award is causing quite a stir, and the growing consensus is that any attempts by Trump or his supporters to influence the Nobel Committee are, in fact, backfiring. It seems the more pressure put on the committee, the less likely he is to be considered.
The prospect of Trump receiving the Nobel Peace Prize is viewed by many as utterly absurd, a complete devaluation of the award itself. It’s the equivalent of handing over a symbol of peace to someone who has actively created turmoil, division, and instability. The very notion that he could be considered for this prize while the world grapples with ongoing conflicts, fueled in part by his actions, is almost a slap in the face to those who have genuinely worked for peace.
Critics point out that Trump’s actions, from alienating allies to instigating economic and geopolitical warfare, hardly align with the values the Nobel Peace Prize represents. The consequences of his policies have reverberated globally, creating instability and suffering for countless individuals. The idea of rewarding such actions with a peace prize is seen as a dangerous precedent, undermining the credibility of the committee and the award itself.
The committee’s historical decisions also come into play. The Nobel Prize for Barack Obama, for example, was met with some skepticism, raising questions about the committee’s criteria and the potential for political considerations to cloud their judgment. Some argue for stricter rules, such as disqualifying any nominee who has publicly expressed interest in the award. After all, the Nobel Prize is meant to honor those who have made significant contributions to peace, not those who have lobbied for recognition.
Furthermore, the perception that Trump and his supporters are desperately seeking validation from the cultural and popular media is also a key factor. The idea that they are attempting to use the Nobel Peace Prize to bolster their worldview is seen as a cynical manipulation of the award’s prestige. Public pressure from Trump and his allies to get himself nominated is most likely counterproductive.
The situation is complicated by the fact that the Nobel Committee is well aware of the global sentiment towards Trump. They understand that awarding him the prize would be seen as a betrayal of their values and a disservice to the cause of peace. Given his history and the current global climate, the committee is more likely to award it to an individual with a proven track record of promoting peace and cooperation. The committee may decide to honor an underling or someone who has been tangentially involved to avoid awarding the prize to Trump.
The pressure on the committee is immense, and the potential for the award to be seen as meaningless is significant. If Trump were to receive the prize, it would be seen as a political maneuver, a validation of a worldview that is fundamentally at odds with the values the award is meant to uphold.
Adding to the drama, it’s clear that if Trump were to win, the prize would likely be met with widespread derision and disbelief. This is a reaction that could overshadow the award’s intended purpose and highlight the political nature of the situation. The idea of a leader who has been accused of inciting violence and sowing division receiving a peace prize is, in many eyes, nothing short of a mockery of the award.
The committee is undoubtedly facing a difficult decision. They must balance the desire to recognize those who have truly contributed to peace with the potential for controversy and backlash. Norway is indeed on edge, and the world is watching.