By John Q. Hosedrinker 
As the announcement of the Nobel Peace Prize nears, Norwegian politicians are preparing for potential repercussions from the US should Donald Trump not be awarded the prize. The Norwegian Nobel Committee finalized their decision days before a recent ceasefire agreement, with experts deeming a Trump win highly unlikely. Concerns arise due to Trump’s history of expecting the prize and his volatile nature, with some speculating on possible retaliatory actions. While Trump has made efforts towards peace, his actions regarding international relations and democratic values conflict with the criteria for the Nobel Prize.
Read the original article here
Norway braces for Trump’s reaction if he does not win Nobel peace prize. Well, isn’t this a headline? The thought alone is enough to make you shake your head, isn’t it? The idea that an entire country, a nation known for its commitment to peace and diplomacy, would need to prepare for the fallout of a single person’s disappointment is, frankly, absurd. It’s as if the world has been put on alert, anticipating a tantrum of epic proportions.
If you’re asking, “is the world really trip-wired for one person’s feelings?” the answer seems to be, unfortunately, yes. The narrative seems to be that if Trump doesn’t win the Nobel Peace Prize, the consequences could be… well, let’s just say it won’t be pretty. One can almost envision the scene: the orange-tinged rage, the ketchup-stained walls, the indignant tweets, and the escalating economic warfare. The fear is that the “tiny penis temper tantrum” could lead to further actions, and the consequences will be borne by the American people.
The potential for Trump to cause “economic violence” against his own people is a real concern. It’s an echo of past actions. The history suggests that rather than accepting the situation, Trump would find a way to turn the situation into a perceived attack against him. If he doesn’t get his way, it could be a full-blown eruption of narcissistic rage and petty vindictiveness. “Tantrum” is a good word to describe it.
And it’s not just the possibility of economic repercussions. There’s a fear that his reaction could involve further division within the United States. There’s a deep sense that Trump is a person who is divisive and someone who makes war on his own people. How can such an individual possibly be worthy of the Nobel Peace Prize?
The Nobel Peace Prize is supposed to recognize individuals who have made significant contributions to peace and understanding between nations. It seems many people feel that Trump’s actions have been the antithesis of this goal. He has been accused of actively harming “fraternity between nations” and working against the principles of diplomacy. The man is widely perceived as odious, craven, corrupt, feckless, untrustworthy, unpredictable, unreliable, and incoherent. It’s hard to find people who would want to associate with a convicted sex offender, potentially a pedophile. Giving him this award would make a mockery of the entire process.
It’s easy to see the potential for chaos if Trump doesn’t get his way. It’s hard to imagine him gracefully accepting defeat. This is a man who, according to some, seems to crave validation and attention. His obsession with the Nobel Peace Prize isn’t just a desire for recognition; it’s a symbol of everything he feels he deserves and everything he feels he’s been denied.
The whole scenario begs the question: why is the world so concerned about this? Why should Norway, or anyone, have to brace for a reaction to something he isn’t awarded? The answer, sadly, lies in the nature of his personality and the power he still wields.
Perhaps the answer is to simply tell him to “Fuck Right Off.” This approach is radical and would likely cause a more rapid backlash.
The thought of Trump winning the Nobel Peace Prize is enough to raise eyebrows. It would devalue the award. If you want to enrage people, give the prize to someone who so clearly doesn’t deserve it. This is about as likely as a person going through life without ever making a mistake.
The sheer audacity of the situation is almost comical. It’s a reminder of the times we live in, where the actions and reactions of a single individual can dominate global discourse. The fear is that Norway and the committee that decides the prize will be held hostage by a person’s ego.
The fact that this is even a consideration highlights the level of immaturity that has come to be associated with a single country. It’s a sign that the world is holding its breath, waiting to see what kind of tantrum this “special boy” will throw. This situation shows the extreme polarization of America. The United States must find a way to return to a semblance of a decent country.