By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The No Kings movement is preparing for upcoming protests against President Trump on October 18, spurred by “increasing political tensions and military presence.” As part of this preparation, the group held a safety and security training focused on de-escalation techniques. This training reflects the group’s growing professionalism and concern about potential risks, as evidenced by their previous coordination of 1,800 protests in June. Organizers aim to mobilize across all 50 states to “defend democratic norms and reject authoritarianism,” particularly in response to Trump’s policies.
Read the original article here
No Kings movement, in preparation for the upcoming anti-Trump protest, has issued a series of warnings, primarily focused on potential provocateurs and the possibility of orchestrated violence. The group seems particularly concerned about individuals attempting to disrupt the peace, and the potential for law enforcement actions such as “kettling,” where protesters are confined within a limited area. The overarching message is clear: be vigilant, stay peaceful, and document everything.
The core worry revolves around the infiltration of the protest by actors with ulterior motives. The implication is that these individuals could be working to incite violence, create chaos, and ultimately tarnish the reputation of the movement. There’s a strong sense that the goal is to discredit the protest by presenting it as a site of unrest and disorder. The movement’s leadership is urging participants to recognize and expose these bad actors, potentially through recording their actions and reporting them to the authorities.
This call for vigilance extends to the media landscape as well. The suggestion is that right-wing media outlets are already laying the groundwork to paint the protest in a negative light, potentially by highlighting isolated incidents or exaggerating the actions of a few. This paints a picture where any negative event, regardless of its true scope, will be used to undermine the entire protest.
Furthermore, there is a clear expectation of increased scrutiny and potentially aggressive tactics from law enforcement. The warnings about “kettling” suggest a concern that police may attempt to control or contain protesters in a way that could lead to unnecessary confrontations. The advice to record interactions with law enforcement further underscores the need for documentation and a focus on transparency.
The potential for escalation is seen as a key concern. It’s clear the organizers are preparing for the event as a target for agitators looking to provoke a response. The leadership is urging all participants to de-escalate any conflict by remaining calm and not reacting to provocation.
A deeper layer of apprehension arises from the connections between individuals and groups aligned with former President Trump and potential efforts to infiltrate and disrupt these protests. These alleged connections involve individuals tied to extremist groups and government agencies. This perceived threat, which is not new to the movement, adds another layer of complexity and potential danger to the situation.
The emphasis on nonviolence and the training of “peacekeepers” demonstrate a proactive approach to mitigating potential conflicts. The movement’s efforts to equip protesters with de-escalation techniques suggest a commitment to maintaining a peaceful atmosphere. This further reinforces the message that the movement aims to be a peaceful demonstration, and is working actively to prevent any incidents of violence or disruption.
The anticipation of a counter-narrative is strong. There’s a clear awareness that the opposition is likely to portray the protests as dangerous or even terrorist-related. This underscores the need to counteract the negative narrative by emphasizing peaceful conduct, documenting any incidents, and staying focused on the core message.
Concerns are expressed about the potential for legal consequences. Suggestions have been made that provocateurs may be present, and any negative incidents would be utilized by the opposing forces to make the protesters look dangerous or even terrorists. The intent of which would be to deny protesters rights and reduce their freedom of expression.
There are differing views on the effectiveness of solely peaceful protests. Some believe that they can be insufficient, given the current political environment. This suggests a debate within the movement about the most effective tactics for achieving their goals. The overall message is one of strategic awareness and preperation, with a call for vigilance and the preservation of rights.
The “No Kings” movement seems to be preparing for a challenging environment. The warnings issued before the protest are not just about the actions of individuals but also about the broader political landscape and the potential for efforts to undermine the group’s message and goals. The central message is clear: by maintaining peace, documenting events, and remaining focused on their cause, protesters can mitigate the risks and amplify their voices.