By John Q. Hosedrinker 
California Governor Gavin Newsom has voiced concern regarding the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) deployment of poll watchers to several California counties, including those requested by the California Republican Party. Newsom suggests this is a prelude to challenging the election results, particularly if Democrats are successful. He further warned of the potential involvement of other federal agencies like ICE and Border Patrol. While local election officials have stated that the presence of election observers is a standard practice, this marks another point of tension between Newsom and the Trump administration, mirroring prior disputes over federal intervention in California.
Read the original article here
Newsom Says Trump Is ‘Rigging the Election’ With Federal Poll Monitors
The assertion that Trump’s actions involving federal poll monitors constitute an effort to “rig the election” immediately raises some eyebrows. It’s a bold claim, and it’s certainly generating a lot of buzz. The underlying concern, as I understand it, centers on the idea that these monitors aren’t there to ensure fair play, but rather to intimidate voters or create a pretext for challenging election results.
This fear is amplified by the idea that these poll monitors are just the tip of the iceberg, the vanguard of a broader strategy. The potential implications are pretty unsettling, suggesting a concerted effort to undermine the integrity of the electoral process. I can understand the worry that this could lead to the invalidation of election results in states where they don’t like the outcome. That feels like a very real concern for many people, especially given past rhetoric and actions.
The strategy, as outlined by many, seems to involve various tactics, including questioning results, refusing to certify elections, and ultimately, trying to keep those they don’t favor out of office. It’s a vision where the will of the voters is subverted, with only the winners that this administration likes actually being allowed to “win.” The use of federal monitors could be seen as a way to create a false narrative to justify these actions, to build a case for questioning or even canceling elections.
The overall sentiment seems to be that this is not about fixing problems. It’s about manipulating the outcome and it’s being done in plain sight. Some suggest that Trump is essentially running a long con, and that the GOP is along for the ride. The idea is that the goal isn’t necessarily to change the voting machines, but rather to create doubt and confusion about the legitimacy of the results.
Given the potential for voter intimidation, there are some serious conversations about a national strike or work stoppage to create a disruption. It would be a strong and decisive way to respond to these kinds of actions. Of course, that would present some major logistical hurdles, but it would certainly get their attention. The idea is to make sure people know their voices matter.
Many are concerned that Trump is actively gearing up for a revolution, and that he is weaponizing various government agencies to achieve his goals. The idea is that, rather than canceling elections outright, the goal is to rig them subtly, making people *think* their vote matters while the results are predetermined.
There’s a lot of talk about how the international community might weigh in. The suggestion that independent observers, possibly even the UN, should monitor the poll monitors has come up frequently. The basic idea is that if there is any question about the legitimacy of the process, it’s essential to have a third party watching the watchers.
It goes without saying that the stakes are extremely high. The underlying sense is that the foundation of American democracy is at risk, and that the GOP is chipping away at it. This is not just a partisan issue, but rather a fundamental question about the future of the country. Many are afraid of how the future is being shaped.
That feeling seems to be feeding into some pretty strong feelings. There is a sense of betrayal that the electoral process has been corrupted. There is a concern that those who voted for Trump are either complicit or apathetic to these developments. There’s a lot of talk about how they’re following the playbook from authoritarian regimes.
The question of whether to fight fire with fire is being asked as well. Some express concern that those who oppose what’s happening are left with few choices. There are suggestions that the government might even try to detain individuals once they cross state lines.
The bottom line is that a lot of people are worried about what they see as a serious threat to the integrity of elections. The use of federal poll monitors is being perceived not as a solution, but as a potential weapon in a campaign to subvert the will of the voters. If these accusations are true, then we are in for a turbulent election year.